Any way to evaluate such an integral

  • Thread starter Thread starter caduceus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around the evaluation of the integral \(\int e^{2x}x^{-1}dx\), exploring potential methods and interpretations related to its complexity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the possibility of using integration by parts and substitutions, with some expressing skepticism about their effectiveness. Others mention the connection to the exponential integral function, suggesting that the integral may not simplify to elementary functions.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various approaches being considered but no consensus on a definitive method for evaluation. Some participants have provided insights into the nature of the integral and its relation to special functions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the implications of the integral's complexity and its geometric interpretation, questioning the meaning of certain symbols encountered in related literature.

caduceus
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Is there any way to evaluate such an integral; \int e^{2x}x^{-1}dx

Any attempts will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


\int e^{2x}x^{-1}dx = \int e^{2x}dln(x)

and then partial integration

that's my first guess...

marlon
 


I don't believe that this integral is amenable to the application of integration by parts. I tried a couple of the obvious substitutions for integration by parts, but didn't get anything that was simpler.
 


and then partial integration

that's my first guess...

marlon

I guess if we proceed it, we will get back into the starting integral and can obtain no solution.
 


There is a special function called the 'exponential integral' that's closely related to your integral. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_integral That's a pretty good sign there is no simple way to reduce that to elementary functions.
 


So this integral requires a complex solution? What does that mean in terms of the geometric interpretation of integrals?
 


It's not complex, Ei is real.
What geometric interpretation (other than the usual of integral as area under a curve) would you expect?
 


CompuChip said:
It's not complex, Ei is real.
What geometric interpretation (other than the usual of integral as area under a curve) would you expect?

None, now that you said Ei is real. The equation on the wiki page threw me off where it has Ei is related to E1 as follows and then it has some odd symbol I haven't seen and an i. What does the funny + looking symbol mean?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
10K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K