Anyone distinguish average velocity and instantaneous velocity please ?

AI Thread Summary
Average velocity refers to the overall change in position over a larger time interval, while instantaneous velocity measures the change at a specific moment in time. In chemistry, this distinction is illustrated through reaction rates, such as the decomposition of H2O2, where average rates can be calculated between two points on a curve. The graph of molarity versus time shows that as points are chosen closer together, the calculated slope becomes more representative of the instantaneous rate. This highlights that instantaneous velocity provides a precise measurement at a single point, while average velocity gives a broader overview over a larger interval. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately analyzing reaction dynamics.
Athikom 02
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Anyone distinguish "average velocity" and "instantaneous velocity" please ?

I can not distinguish clearly between "average rate and "instantaneous rate".Would you please help me and give examples would be glad.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


rate = change in some observable quantity / change in time

Average rate is used when 'change in time' is something fairly large relative to expected changes in the rate. Instantaneous rate is used when 'change in time' is something fairly small relative to expected changes in the rate.
 


Okay, so I assume that since this is in Chemistry you are referring to reaction rates.

Let's say that I decompose H2O2. If you graph the molarity of H2O2 as a function of time, it is a decreasing curve that is concave upwards. If I pick two points, let's say at t=1 and t=3, and measure the molarity at each, I will get two different values. If I use the standard point-slope equation, I will get an average rate, ie the general rate at which it was reacting between those two points.

But think about how the graph is curved. obviously, if I pick two points and draw a line to connect them, the slope of that line is not equal to the exact graph. That's because the graph has concavity: the slope changes constantly with respect to time. But the closer together my two times are, the more accurate my line between them will be relative to the original graph.

Nao let's say I were to gradually pick points that were closer together on the graph until there was almost no different between them. The slope i measure would be the exact rate of reaction at the time. This is an instantaneous rate; it is the rate of rxn at a single instant of time.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top