Anyone know a reactor physics book better than Duderstadt and Hamilton?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the evaluation of nuclear reactor physics textbooks, particularly comparing Duderstadt and Hamilton (D&H) with other notable texts. While D&H is praised for its comprehensive coverage of relevant topics in nuclear reactor design and analysis, it is critiqued for its less direct style. Alternatives such as "Introduction to Nuclear Reactor Physics" by Robert E. Masterson (2017) and "Nuclear Reactor Physics" by Weston M. Stacey (2007, 2018) are recommended for their modern approaches. The conversation highlights the evolving nature of nuclear fuel design and the importance of updated educational resources in the field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear reactor design principles
  • Familiarity with thermal, epithermal, and fast dominant energy spectra
  • Knowledge of transport and diffusion theory in nuclear physics
  • Basic concepts of nuclear fuel management
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Introduction to Nuclear Reactor Physics" by Robert E. Masterson
  • Explore "Nuclear Reactor Physics, 3rd Edition" by Weston M. Stacey
  • Investigate "Fundamentals of Nuclear Engineering" by Brent J. Lewis et al.
  • Compare the table of contents of various nuclear reactor physics textbooks
USEFUL FOR

Nuclear engineering students, educators in reactor physics, and professionals involved in nuclear reactor design and analysis will benefit from this discussion.

random_soldier
Messages
80
Reaction score
10
I really like the book for how much it covers. There's not a single topic that's missed that is relevant to nuclear reactor design/analysis. Often other books can miss a topic or two. It's just that the style is not to the point and often time is wasted talking about things that are irrelevant or won't be explained, at least until way later.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy
Physics news on Phys.org
Duderstadt and Hamilton, like Lamarsh's books, is a classic, and one will find deficiencies in any text. It is challenging to cover every possible subject, partly because the subject is so complex, since there are many types of nuclear reactor systems requiring different elaborations on similar topics that are system dependent, e.g., thermal vs epithermal vs fast dominant energy spectra, or transport vs diffusion theory.
 
I think something that covers LWRs would be sufficient. That's what D&H seems to cover mostly and that's pretty much what I'm looking for. I don't mind minor excursions to other types but D&H seems to do only that and I'm fine with that.
 
I used Lamarsh's Nuclear Reactor Theory during my undergraduate program, and D&H during my graduate program. I used D&H to teach nuclear reactor theory as a teaching assistant, and it is pretty basic material. So much has changed in nuclear fuel design and core/fuel management since I was in grad school more than 30 years ago.

The only other texts I of which I am aware are:

Introduction to Nuclear Reactor Physics, by Robert E. Masterson, Taylor & Francis, 2017
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315118055
It's relatively new, and I don't know much about it. I recommend comparing the table of contents with other texts. There is another book by the same author, Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics: An Introduction to Nuclear Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, 2019
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315226231

Nuclear Reactor Physics, 2nd, Completely Revised and Enlarged Edition, by Weston M. Stacey, Wiley, June 2007, which is probably considered a modern classic after the older classic by Lamarsh.
https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Nuclear...+Revised+and+Enlarged+Edition-p-9783527611058

There is a 3rd Edition of Stacey's book
Nuclear Reactor Physics, 3rd Edition, 2018
https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Nuclear+Reactor+Physics,+3rd+Edition-p-9783527812301

Yet another book, Fundamentals of Nuclear Engineering
Brent J. Lewis, E. Nihan Onder, Andrew A. Prudil
https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Fundamentals+of+Nuclear+Engineering-p-9781119271499

I've known Lewis about three decades, since I've used some of his research and experimental work, and I only recently met Prudil a few years ago through a mutual colleague and friend.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: atyy and random_soldier

Similar threads

  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
18K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K