Anyone know much about combinatorics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LAHLH
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Combinatorics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on counting lattice paths between two points with n steps, specifically when paths cannot cross two boundaries. The original poster has a grasp of the unrestricted case and seeks to understand the bounded case, referencing a specific lemma for guidance. They mention difficulty accessing relevant literature, including works by Mohanty and Narayana, which contain proofs for the problem. Suggestions include using the reflection principle, drawing parallels to the ballot problem, to tackle the bounded case. The conversation highlights the challenge of finding resources and proofs in combinatorial mathematics.
LAHLH
Messages
405
Reaction score
2
Hi,

I'm looking at the problem of counting lattice paths between two points with n steps, and I think I have my head around the case without boundaries to bump into (see e.g. http://www.robertdickau.com/lattices.html). However I'd like to work out the answer for the case of my path not being able to cross two boundaries , I know the answer is given here http://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~blakehunter/Masters.pdf , on p10 Lemma 1-1.1, and I can sort of see this going to be related to the case without boundaries and catalan numbers, but I would like to flesh out the details...

I believe the proof is given in "Mohanty, S. G., Lattice Path Counting and Applications", and also "Narayana, T.V., Lattice Path Combinatorics With Statistical Applications" but both of these seem out of print and even my uni library doesn't have them, nor can I seem to find them online. Does anyone know where I can get a copy or somewhere else that does the proof of the above? or just how to prove the above fullstop?

thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
noone out there know how to do this? It's not my field but I think it's a pretty standard problem in combinatorics if I could only find the books..

I think you need to use the reflection principle a few times, but I'm not sure on the specifics. Bit like the ballot problem but with two boundaries that can't be crossed.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top