Anyone up for a fresh real world challenge?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Carpenter T
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Challenge Real world
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on techniques for calculating common rafter lengths in carpentry without the use of a framing square. The key method involves using the Pythagorean theorem to determine the common rafter length per foot of run, specifically for a 4:12 pitch, which is calculated to be 12.65 inches. The challenge lies in performing multiplication and converting decimal fractions to inch fractions mentally. The suggested approach is to maintain calculations in "carpenter fraction" form throughout the process to simplify mental math.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Pythagorean theorem
  • Familiarity with common rafter lengths and pitches
  • Knowledge of converting decimal fractions to inch fractions
  • Basic carpentry skills and terminology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for mental multiplication techniques
  • Learn about "carpenter fractions" and their applications in carpentry
  • Explore advanced Pythagorean theorem applications in construction
  • Study the use of framing squares for rafter calculations
USEFUL FOR

Carpenters, construction professionals, and anyone interested in improving their mental math skills for rafter calculations.

Carpenter T
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Many carpenters have either seen or heard of someone who could calculate rafter lengths in their head. Perhaps these people are just gifted number crunchers, but I want to crack the mystery behind it. That's why I’m calling on you mathematical geniuses for help.

Are there any tricks to calculating common rafter lengths IN YOUR HEAD (with no framing square either) besides memorizing the “lengths per foot of run,” or is it just plain number crunching after that?

For example, suppose you have a building you measure at 33’. From this point you put your tape measure down and do the rest in your head with no aid of a square.

Now I know a 5/12 or a 9/12 would be easy, but it's the rest of the pitches I need help with. So say you want to frame the often used pitch of 4:12. 33’ (span) ÷ 2 (half the span) = 16’-6” (unadjusted run). In this instance I’ll use the unadjusted run for the sake of simplicity and figure on subtracting half the thickness of the ridge board after the rafter is laid out. I’m also going to avoid a building width that has a run including inch fractions so that (for my sake) I don’t complicate this too much right now.

The “common rafter length per foot of run” is 12.65: 16 (4 squared) + 144 (12 squared) = 160 √160 = 12.64911 or 12.65. If someone already knew the “length per foot of run” for a 4:12 pitch (found on any quality framing square), he could skip the whole A2 + B2 = C2 thing and start with 12.65.

Now the problem becomes a matter of multiplication and conversion: 12.65 x 16.5. For most people it’s kind of difficult to multiply 12.65 by 16.5 and be sure of the answer (208.725) without writing it down. Okay, maybe it's not to difficult for most people here, but for most carpenters it is.

Of course, the decimal inch fraction .725 must also be converted into an inch fraction of 11/16 (.725 x 16 = 11.6 or approximately 11/16). Answer: 208 11/16” (17’-4 11/16”).

Is there any way to either BYPASS or SIMPLIFY these last two multiplication and conversion steps so as to make it easier to calculate in your head? Yeah, I know I could just use a calculator, but I just thought it would be fun if I could do it in my head.

Your ingenuity is appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For one thing, I wouldn't convert from fraction to decimal and then back; I'd keep it in "carpenter fraction" form the whole time. (By that I mean fractions with denominators as powers of two: 1/2, 3/16, etc.)

So a carpenter would know that 4:12 pitch has length per foot of run of 12 5/8, or more precisely 12 21/32, and then calculates from there.
 
Thanks for the reply. That makes sense; I think doing that will help a little bit.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 125 ·
5
Replies
125
Views
20K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
16K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
22K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
11K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
9K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
13K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
16K