AP Biology: All 6 Functional Groups

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the six main functional groups in AP Biology: hydroxyl, carbonyl, carboxyl, amino, sulfhydryl, and phosphate. A question arises about the existence of a molecule that contains all six functional groups. Participants suggest that while no naturally occurring molecule may have all six, one can create a synthetic molecule by using a straight carbon chain and adding the functional groups. This approach allows for a better understanding of how these groups interact within organic compounds. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of functional groups in biological molecules and their potential combinations.
Rawr
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I was studying my brother's old notes to prepare me for my upcoming AP Biology class.

I read over six main functional groups (hydroxyl, carbonyl, carboxyl, amino, sulfhydrl, phosphate) and subsequently, there were follow-up questions. One of them asked to draw a molecule with all of the six main functional group.

Unfortunately, my brother didn't put down an answer, but I was just wondering if there really is a molecule that contains all of the six functional groups I listed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could just create one yourself... Just use a straight carbon chain and add groups on the carbons...
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top