Apollo 1 command Module Pressure/Force

  • Thread starter Thread starter mr.toronto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Apollo module
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the force on the Apollo 1 command module hatch during the "plugs out test," with external pressures of 14.8 PSI and 17.5 PSI noted. The conversion of these pressures into Pascals reveals values of approximately 102,042.15 Pascals and 120,657.95 Pascals, respectively. To determine the force, the area of the hatch is necessary, with a rough estimate of 0.25 m² suggested. The key formula to use is Pressure = Force / Area, which requires calculating the pressure difference between the inside and outside of the module. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately assessing the forces acting on the hatch.
mr.toronto
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What would have been the force on the hatch of the Apollo 1 command module (Before the fire) during the "plugs out test"


Homework Equations


more info 14.8 PSI of pressure outside of the module and 17.5 PSI
1 PSI= 6 894.75729 pascals. 14.8 x 6894.74=102 042.152 Pascals
17.5 x 6894.74=120657.95 Pascals

so I'm kind of stuck here.



The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to know the area of the hatch. I had a quick look round but couldn't find it anywhere.

If you wanted to make a rough guess you could assume perhaps 0.25 m^2 and go from there. You need to use the formula:

Pressure = Force * Area
 
so what would I do for the pressure though
 
You just need to caclculate the pressure difference between the inside and the outside.

It's just like if you wanted to calculate the next force acting on a body if it had 4N acting on it one way, and 10N acting on it the opposite way. The net force is 6N, in the direction of the biggest force.

This is just the same, but instead of forces you're dealing with pressures, which are the force over a unit area.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top