Appeal to re-open my lock thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter SysAdmin
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A user is seeking to appeal the locking of their thread, claiming a misunderstanding of their question, which they assert is general rather than quantum-specific. They express frustration over the lack of opportunity to clarify their inquiry before the thread was closed. The moderator points out that the question had already been addressed in multiple existing threads, highlighting a violation of forum rules regarding duplicate posts. The user requests guidance on how to properly ask about general spin in a discrete universe without facing a ban for reposting. The discussion emphasizes the need for clearer communication and understanding of forum protocols.
SysAdmin
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
some guy,mentor i guess,lock my thread.the exact time of lock i forgot,so i can not tell, is my qustion will got reply or not.

apparently he missunderstant my question and not giving me a chance to rephrase my question. he think I am asking in quantum,but infact my question is general.

so how to appeal to re-open the thread, because he will ban me if i re- ask.

he should let the thread open until someone do dialog one or two with me.because if no one reply,i will not push it,i know the rules,it will be dead naturally.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you decided to ask this out in the open, I will spell it out to you in very clear terms:

You were told to browse through existing threads in the Quantum Physics forum. The topic you asked has been discussed NUMEROUS times, and has been addressed in those many threads.

Instead, you reopened and asked the identical question, thus violating our rules on multiple post, without even bothering to do anything new on your own or doing what I suggested.

So which part of that did you not understand?

Zz.
 
the part you close it without let me think what is what i want to know.now after I'm thinking,i want to ask about spin,general spin,call it mechanical if you want,in discret universe.thats is,this spin only occupy certain angle. can we assign certain number to this spin? or will no difent,because spin always 90 degree btwen angular momentum and spin plane.

you are the one that bring quantum in here.if that universe is nonesense,you can tell nicely.or if it repost,at lest give me keyword to ease the search if not the link.

i know I'm thinking slow,because I'm ordinary people, not physics PhD like the expert here.
 
SysAdmin said:
the part you close it without let me think what is what i want to know.now after I'm thinking,i want to ask about spin,general spin,call it mechanical if you want,in discret universe.thats is,this spin only occupy certain angle. can we assign certain number to this spin? or will no difent,because spin always 90 degree btwen angular momentum and spin plane.

you are the one that bring quantum in here.if that universe is nonesense,you can tell nicely.or if it repost,at lest give me keyword to ease the search if not the link.

i know I'm thinking slow,because I'm ordinary people, not physics PhD like the expert here.

If you want information on non-quantum spin, the keywords are Angular Momentum. Please read the following Hyperphysics entry, and also do some other searching with Google for articles explaining Angular Momentum.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/amom.html

.
 
Dunno about you but trying to decipher the language barrier made my head spin.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top