Thread Locked. Not Open for further comments...

  • Thread starter Tom.G
  • Start date

Tom.G

Science Advisor
2,611
1,442
"Thread Locked. Not Open for further comments."
... would be a nicer, but still informative, way than the current:

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.

Which comes across more as "Shut up plebe! You have nothing to say here!"
(Even though they latter may be true!)

EDIT: OK, I'll go with @DrClaude (below) with "Closed" rather than "Locked."
 
Last edited:

DrClaude

Mentor
6,867
3,007
I would even use "closed" instead of "locked."
 
Just stock software phrasing. We can soften, but not a high priority.
 

Nugatory

Mentor
12,110
4,585
Are you prioritizing by value, or by the value:effort ratio? That's a question, not an argument, especially because I'm not the one who'll have to do the work..... But it's easy for engineering types to underestimate the ROI on improving notifications.
 
value:effort ratio
Almost always this :smile: This is easy to change, but I also have 100 easy changes on my list and all the work done with PF5 this past 30 days has left me really behind in real life work obligations 😵😬😀
 

Want to reply to this thread?

"Thread Locked. Not Open for further comments..." You must log in or register to reply here.

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top