Thread Locked. Not Open for further comments....

  • Thread starter Tom.G
  • Start date
  • #1
Tom.G
Science Advisor
Gold Member
4,745
3,503
"Thread Locked. Not Open for further comments."
... would be a nicer, but still informative, way than the current:

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.

Which comes across more as "Shut up plebe! You have nothing to say here!"
(Even though they latter may be true!)

EDIT: OK, I'll go with @DrClaude (below) with "Closed" rather than "Locked."
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu and DrClaude

Answers and Replies

  • #2
DrClaude
Mentor
8,124
4,942
I would even use "closed" instead of "locked."
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron and Tom.G
  • #3
18,954
9,273
Just stock software phrasing. We can soften, but not a high priority.
 
  • #4
Nugatory
Mentor
14,212
8,101
Are you prioritizing by value, or by the value:effort ratio? That's a question, not an argument, especially because I'm not the one who'll have to do the work... But it's easy for engineering types to underestimate the ROI on improving notifications.
 
  • #5
18,954
9,273
value:effort ratio
Almost always this :smile: This is easy to change, but I also have 100 easy changes on my list and all the work done with PF5 this past 30 days has left me really behind in real life work obligations 😵😬😀
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu

Suggested for: Thread Locked. Not Open for further comments....

Replies
8
Views
705
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
759
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
602
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
451
Replies
5
Views
703
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
919
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
108
Top