Application of the equations of motion with constant acceleration

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on a problem involving a bicyclist who accelerates to catch up with a friend riding at a constant speed. The initial calculations for the time and distance were incorrect due to misapplication of the equations of motion. The correct approach involves considering the relative motion between the two cyclists, factoring in the initial delay of two seconds for the bicyclist. The participants emphasize the importance of using the right equations and understanding the relationship between distance, time, and acceleration. Overall, the solution requires careful application of the equations of motion with constant acceleration.
sillybean
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Application of the equations of motion with constant acceleration

Homework Statement


A bicyclist is finishing his repair of a flat tire when a friend rides by with a constant speed of 4.0 m/s. Two seconds later the bicyclist hops on his bike and accelerates at 2.2 m/s^2 until he catches his friend.

a)How much time does it take until he catches his friend (after his friend passes him)?
b)How far has he traveled in this time?
c)What is his speed when he catches up?


Homework Equations



V=Vo + at

X= Xo + volt + 1/2at^2

X= Xo + 1/2(Vo + V)t



The Attempt at a Solution


Okay so I tried figuring out the distance that the friend who passed the one doing repairs traveled in 2 seconds. Since his velocity was constant, I reasoned that he traveled 8 meters in 2 seconds. Then I plugged in the acceleration given in the problem along with the distance i figured into the equation: X= Xo + volt + 1/2at^2. (I made Xo and Vo = zero since the guy doing the repairs starts from rest)

It looked like this: 8.0m = 0+0+ 1/2(2.2m/s^2)t^2
8.0m = 1.1m/s^2(t^2)
7.27s^2=t^2 (took square root of both sides)
t=2.7s

but that was wrong.

I then figured the distance I reasoned was wrong and actually used an equation this time.
I used X= Xo + 1/2(Vo + V)t
X = 0 + 1/2 (4.0 m/s)(2.0s)
X = 4.0 m

I redid my work using this new distance (which I already thought was wrong >:C)
X= Xo + volt + 1/2at^2
4.0m = 0 + 0 + 1/2(2.2)t^2
4.0 = 1.1t^2
3.6 = t^2 (square root)
t=1.9s

Guess what. It was wrong.

What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose it has taken a total of t secs from the time when the friend passes him by to the time when he catches up. Then the friend has traveled at a const speed for t secs, whereas the repairing guy has traveled the same dist in (t-2) s. The rest you know.
 
sillybean said:

Homework Statement


A bicyclist is finishing his repair of a flat tire when a friend rides by with a constant speed of 4.0 m/s. Two seconds later the bicyclist hops on his bike and accelerates at 2.2 m/s^2 until he catches his friend.

a)How much time does it take until he catches his friend (after his friend passes him)?
b)How far has he traveled in this time?
c)What is his speed when he catches up?


Homework Equations



V=Vo + at

X= Xo + volt + 1/2at^2

X= Xo + 1/2(Vo + V)t



The Attempt at a Solution


Okay so I tried figuring out the distance that the friend who passed the one doing repairs traveled in 2 seconds. Since his velocity was constant, I reasoned that he traveled 8 meters in 2 seconds. Then I plugged in the acceleration given in the problem along with the distance i figured into the equation: X= Xo + volt + 1/2at^2. (I made Xo and Vo = zero since the guy doing the repairs starts from rest)

It looked like this: 8.0m = 0+0+ 1/2(2.2m/s^2)t^2
8.0m = 1.1m/s^2(t^2)
7.27s^2=t^2 (took square root of both sides)
t=2.7s

but that was wrong.

I then figured the distance I reasoned was wrong and actually used an equation this time.
I used X= Xo + 1/2(Vo + V)t
X = 0 + 1/2 (4.0 m/s)(2.0s)
X = 4.0 m

I redid my work using this new distance (which I already thought was wrong >:C)
X= Xo + volt + 1/2at^2
4.0m = 0 + 0 + 1/2(2.2)t^2
4.0 = 1.1t^2
3.6 = t^2 (square root)
t=1.9s

Guess what. It was wrong.

What am I doing wrong?

use concepts of relative velocity...this shall make the problem much easier...
 
thanks again you guys are life savers
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K