Applications of Gauss' Law - two hollow spheres

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the pressure acting on the outer hollow sphere due to the electric field created by the inner hollow sphere, both of which have a uniformly distributed charge of +q. The electric field at the radius of the outer sphere is derived using Gauss' Law, leading to the expression E = kq/r_2^2. The force acting on the outer sphere is calculated as F = kq^2/r_2^2, and the pressure is determined by differentiating force with respect to area, resulting in p = q^2/(16π²r_2^4ε₀). The calculations confirm that the approach is valid and consistent with earlier results. The final expression for pressure is verified to be correct.
knowlewj01
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A hollow sphere of radius r_1 is placed at the centre of a larger hollow sphere of radius r_2.
Both spheres have a uniformly distributed total charge of +q
Find the preassure p(r_2 , q) which acts on the outer sphere.

Homework Equations



\oint\textbf{E.n}dS = 4\pi k Q

p = \frac{dF}{dA}

The Attempt at a Solution



Inside the larger sphere, there is no contribution to electric field from the large sphere, so just consider the electric field at r_2 due to the inner sphere:

E(4\pi r_2^2) = 4\pi k q

E = \frac{kq}{r_2^2}

since F = qE

the force acting at r_2:

F(r_2) = \frac{kq^2}{r_2^2}

p = \frac{F}{A}

p = \frac{kq^2}{4\pi r_2^4}

does this look right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Just had a thought, at the point when calutating force, replace k with \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0}

F(r_2) = \frac{q^2}{4\pi r_2^2 \epsilon_0}

the expression for the total area, A, of the outer sphere is now on the denominator:

A = 4\pi r_2^2

it follows that:

F = \frac{q^2}{A\epsilon_0}

now differentiate F with respect to A:

\frac{dF}{dA} = -\frac{q^2}{A^2 \epsilon_0} = p

p = \frac{q^2}{16\pi^2 r_2^4 \epsilon_0}

gthis is the same answer i got before but i guess it's a more thorough way of doing it.
 
Last edited:
i took the center sphere to act as a point charge, and calculated E then F then P

got exactly the same. so looks good?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top