MHB Applying the distributive law....

  • Thread starter Thread starter tmy942
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
AI Thread Summary
To apply the distributive law to equations with multiple sets of parentheses, each term in the first factor must be multiplied by every term in the second factor. For example, in the expression y = 3(x + 5)(x - 2), you would first distribute 3 to each term in the second set of parentheses after expanding the first set. Similarly, for 3(12 - 7r^2)(10r - 5), distribute 3 to the result of the multiplication of the two sets of parentheses. This method can be applied step-by-step, ensuring that like terms are combined at the end. Understanding this process is essential for simplifying complex algebraic expressions effectively.
tmy942
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm a beginner and I'm trying to wrap my head around some of the basics of algebra. So I have something like this...

y = 3 ( x + 5 ) ( x - 2 )

or this...

3(12-7r^2)(10r-5)

How would I apply the distributive law to these kinds of equations? I've been trying to research this but the only thing I can find is the distributive law in it's simplest form, i.e. a(b+c) = ab + ac. I already understand that. How would I apply it in situations with multiple sets of parentheses being multiplied?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Suppose you have:

$$(a+b)(c+d)$$

You want to take each term in the first factor, and multiply it by each term in the second factor:

$$ac+ad+bc+bd$$

What I did was to begin with the first term in the first factor and multiply it by each of the terms in the second factor, and then do the same for the second term in the first factor.

You could also do it in two steps:

$$(a+b)(c+d)=a(c+d)+b(c+d)=ac+ad+bc+bd$$

When you are finished, you then want to combine like terms, if there are any. Can you use this method on the two examples you posted?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top