MHB Applying the distributive law....

  • Thread starter Thread starter tmy942
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
AI Thread Summary
To apply the distributive law to equations with multiple sets of parentheses, each term in the first factor must be multiplied by every term in the second factor. For example, in the expression y = 3(x + 5)(x - 2), you would first distribute 3 to each term in the second set of parentheses after expanding the first set. Similarly, for 3(12 - 7r^2)(10r - 5), distribute 3 to the result of the multiplication of the two sets of parentheses. This method can be applied step-by-step, ensuring that like terms are combined at the end. Understanding this process is essential for simplifying complex algebraic expressions effectively.
tmy942
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm a beginner and I'm trying to wrap my head around some of the basics of algebra. So I have something like this...

y = 3 ( x + 5 ) ( x - 2 )

or this...

3(12-7r^2)(10r-5)

How would I apply the distributive law to these kinds of equations? I've been trying to research this but the only thing I can find is the distributive law in it's simplest form, i.e. a(b+c) = ab + ac. I already understand that. How would I apply it in situations with multiple sets of parentheses being multiplied?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Suppose you have:

$$(a+b)(c+d)$$

You want to take each term in the first factor, and multiply it by each term in the second factor:

$$ac+ad+bc+bd$$

What I did was to begin with the first term in the first factor and multiply it by each of the terms in the second factor, and then do the same for the second term in the first factor.

You could also do it in two steps:

$$(a+b)(c+d)=a(c+d)+b(c+d)=ac+ad+bc+bd$$

When you are finished, you then want to combine like terms, if there are any. Can you use this method on the two examples you posted?
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top