Appropriateness of Constrained Segmented Univariate Polynomial Regression Model

midnite131
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I've learned that in unconstrained polynomial regression, the optimal order can be determined using two F tests : one to test for the significance of the overall regression, the other to test for the significance of the higher coefficients (assuming the first test passed of course).

However in my application, I'm interested in testing for the appropriateness of a segmented polynomial fit subjected to be first order continuous, with boundary conditions placed at the end of the entire domain as well. The polynomials do not have to have the same order between segments. I should also mention that the join points are known, so I don't have to estimate them.

The closest paper I could find that broaches this topic is Gallant and Fuller's work [1]. Here, they also have a segmented polynomial fit with C1 continuity, but with no constraints. Frustratingly, they make up a test statistic for the appropriateness of their fit "by analogy to linear models theory", yet they provide no references.

I've tried to search for other papers on this topic but to no avail. This leads me to question - is this test statistic trivial to derive for the constrained case, and if so, could you please point me to resources that could help me understand how to do it?

Thanks in advance for your help!

References

[1] Gallant, A.R. and Fuller, W.A. (1973). Fitting segmented polynomial regression models whose join points have to be estimated. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 68, 144-147

p.s. If it helps, I'm an engineer who regrettably didn't pay too much attention in his stats course, so any material no matter how trivial it may seem would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
midnite131 said:
Hi all,

I've learned that in unconstrained polynomial regression, the optimal order can be determined using two F tests : one to test for the significance of the overall regression, the other to test for the significance of the higher coefficients (assuming the first test passed of course).

That's probably true under a certain set of assumptions that are commonly made. Without stating the assumptions, it sounds like too grand a claim.

Speaking only as an operator of Google, there is this paper online:


ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE, COEFFICIENT OF DETERMINATION AND F -TEST FOR LOCAL POLYNOMIAL REGRESSION By Li-Shan Huang and Jianwei Chen

It has other references.

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...zLHsDg&usg=AFQjCNEZsaUitjQ7MjxvKmLElrpxNPOOyw
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top