I Approximating a Black Hole Merger Using a Schwarzschild Model

BlackWhole
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Can a black hole merger be approximated as a daughter Schwarzschild black hole created when two parent Schwarzschild black holes pack close enough together to trigger a local Schwarzschild radius containing their combined mass?
Summary: Can a black hole merger be approximated as a daughter Schwarzschild black hole created when two parent Schwarzschild black holes pack close enough together to trigger a local Schwarzschild radius containing their combined mass?

We know that the radius of the event horizon of a Schwarzschild black hole (SBH) is defined as r_s = 2*G*M/c^2, corresponding to the radius at which the escape velocity is the speed of light. For a binary black hole system, M_1 is the mass of the larger black hole and M_2 is the mass of the smaller. The LIGO event was of the merger of a 36 M_sun (where M_sun is the mass of the sun) black hole and a 29 M_sun black hole, radiating 3 M_sun equivalent energy before resulting in a 62 M_sun black hole. Thus, the larger SBH would have a Schwarzschild radius (SR) of 106 km and the smaller one would have an SR of 86 km.

If we model this super simplistically, then could we say that the black holes "merged" when they approached close enough to trigger an SBH in their vicinity? I attempted to illustrate this in the figure below.

245491


Here, r_s1 is the radius of the larger SBH, r_s2 is the radius of the smaller SBH, x_c1 is the distance from the larger SBH to the system's barycenter, and x_c2 is the distance from the smaller SBH to the system's barycenter. For a sphere centered at the barycenter with the combined system mass of 65 M_sun (the sum of the masses of the two merging SBH's), the two black holes would enter the sphere starting at x_c2 = r_s3, where r_s3 is the SR of the equivalent SBH that would exist as a replacement of the two parent black holes. Here, x_c2 = r_s3 = 192 km. Using the equation for the position of the center of mass of two point masses, we get that x_c1 = M_2/M_1*r_s3, where M_1 is the mass of the larger SBH and M_2 is the mass of the smaller SBH. Thus, the distance between the two black holes at the time of the "merge" would be d_merge = (1+M_2/M_1)*r_s3, where d_merge is the distance between them at that moment. Could we then state that the black holes "merged" when their centers were 347 km apart? We could then model the gravitational energy emission at the moment of the merger as an instantaneous decay of the merged SBH with an SR of 192 km to a "stable" SBH with an SR of 183 km. It is of course simple to note that r_s3 = r_s1+r_s2, and that d_merge > (r_s1+r_s2), meaning that the event horizons of the two merging SBH's do not touch before the merge and are in fact separated by d_separation = d_merge-r_s1-r_s2 = d_merge-r_s3 = 155 km, where d_separation is the minimum distance between the two parent event horizons.

I know that I am neglected the fact that the space occupied by the two black holes is not uniformly dense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Schwarzschild geometry is spherically symmetric. Your situation is not.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top