MHB Approximating Solutions with Coefficients of $Y^m_\ell$

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coefficients
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on approximating the solution for a function \( u(r,\theta,\phi) \) using coefficients from spherical harmonics. The approximation is derived by combining terms from various spherical harmonics, specifically for \( \ell = 0, 1, \) and \( 2 \). The final expression for the approximation is given as \( u(r,\theta,\phi) \simeq 25 + \frac{75\sqrt{2}}{2}r\sin\theta\cos\phi + \frac{125}{\pi}r^2\sin^2\theta\cos 2\phi \). Participants express confusion about integrating the spherical harmonics with the function, particularly regarding the absence of an exponential factor in the provided function. The final approximation successfully combines the contributions from the spherical harmonics to yield a coherent expression.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Using the coefficients determined, combine the terms to arrive at the following approximation for the solution
$$
u(r,\theta,\phi)\simeq 25 + \frac{75\sqrt{2}}{2}r\sin\theta\cos\phi + \frac{125}{\pi}r^2\sin^2\theta\cos 2\phi.
$$

How do I combine them?

The coefficients are
For $\ell = 0$ and $m = 0$, we have
$$
Y^0_0(\theta,\varphi) = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{\pi}}.
$$
For $\ell = 1$ and $m = 1$, we have
\begin{alignat*}{3}
Y^{1}_1 & = & -\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{3}{2\pi}}(\cos^2\theta - 1)^{1/2}e^{i\varphi}\\
& = & -\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{3}{2\pi}}e^{i\varphi} \sin\theta
\end{alignat*}
From $\ell = 1$ and $m = 1$, we can obtain
$$
Y^{-1}_1 = \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{3}{2\pi}}e^{-i\varphi}\sin \theta.
$$
For $\ell = 1$ and $m = 0$, we have
$$
Y^0_1 = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2\sqrt{\pi}}\cos\theta.
$$
For $\ell = 2$ and $m = 2$, we have
\begin{alignat*}{3}
Y^{2}_2 & = & \frac{3}{4}\sqrt{\frac{5}{6\pi}}(\cos^2\theta - 1)e^{2i\varphi}\\
& = & \frac{3}{4}\sqrt{\frac{5}{6\pi}}e^{2i\varphi}\sin^2\theta
\end{alignat*}
From $\ell = 2$ and $m = 2$, we can obtain
\begin{alignat*}{3}
Y^{-2}_2 & = & \frac{3}{4}\sqrt{\frac{5}{6\pi}}e^{-2i\varphi}\sin^2 \theta.
\end{alignat*}
For $\ell = 2$ and $m = 1$, we have
\begin{alignat*}{3}
Y^{1}_2 & = & -\frac{3}{2}\sqrt{\frac{5}{6\pi}}e^{i\varphi}(\cos^2\theta - 1)^{1/2}\cos\theta\\
& = & -\frac{3}{2}\sqrt{\frac{5}{6\pi}}e^{i\varphi}\sin \theta \cos\theta
\end{alignat*}
From $\ell = 2$ and $m = 1$, we can obtain
\begin{alignat*}{3}
Y^{-1}_2 & = & \frac{3}{2}\sqrt{\frac{5}{6\pi}}e^{-i\varphi}\sin \theta \cos\theta.
\end{alignat*}
For $\ell = 2$ and $m = 0$, we have
$$
Y^0_{\ell} = \frac{1}{4}\sqrt{\frac{5}{2\pi}}(3\cos^2\theta - 1).
$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dwsmith said:
Using the coefficients determined, combine the terms to arrive at the following approximation for the solution
$$
u(r,\theta,\phi)\simeq 25 + \frac{75\sqrt{2}}{2}r\sin\theta\cos\phi + \frac{125}{\pi}r^2\sin^2\theta\cos 2\phi.
$$

How do I combine them?

The coefficients are
For $\ell = 0$ and $m = 0$, we have
$$
Y^0_0(\theta,\varphi) = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{\pi}}.
$$
For $\ell = 1$ and $m = 1$, we have
\begin{alignat*}{3}
Y^{1}_1 & = & -\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{3}{2\pi}}(\cos^2\theta - 1)^{1/2}e^{i\varphi}\\
& = & -\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{3}{2\pi}}e^{i\varphi} \sin\theta
\end{alignat*}
From $\ell = 1$ and $m = 1$, we can obtain
$$
Y^{-1}_1 = \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{3}{2\pi}}e^{-i\varphi}\sin \theta.
$$
For $\ell = 1$ and $m = 0$, we have
$$
Y^0_1 = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2\sqrt{\pi}}\cos\theta.
$$
For $\ell = 2$ and $m = 2$, we have
\begin{alignat*}{3}
Y^{2}_2 & = & \frac{3}{4}\sqrt{\frac{5}{6\pi}}(\cos^2\theta - 1)e^{2i\varphi}\\
& = & \frac{3}{4}\sqrt{\frac{5}{6\pi}}e^{2i\varphi}\sin^2\theta
\end{alignat*}
From $\ell = 2$ and $m = 2$, we can obtain
\begin{alignat*}{3}
Y^{-2}_2 & = & \frac{3}{4}\sqrt{\frac{5}{6\pi}}e^{-2i\varphi}\sin^2 \theta.
\end{alignat*}
For $\ell = 2$ and $m = 1$, we have
\begin{alignat*}{3}
Y^{1}_2 & = & -\frac{3}{2}\sqrt{\frac{5}{6\pi}}e^{i\varphi}(\cos^2\theta - 1)^{1/2}\cos\theta\\
& = & -\frac{3}{2}\sqrt{\frac{5}{6\pi}}e^{i\varphi}\sin \theta \cos\theta
\end{alignat*}
From $\ell = 2$ and $m = 1$, we can obtain
\begin{alignat*}{3}
Y^{-1}_2 & = & \frac{3}{2}\sqrt{\frac{5}{6\pi}}e^{-i\varphi}\sin \theta \cos\theta.
\end{alignat*}
For $\ell = 2$ and $m = 0$, we have
$$
Y^0_{\ell} = \frac{1}{4}\sqrt{\frac{5}{2\pi}}(3\cos^2\theta - 1).
$$
I'm a bit confused about this one. The problem is very similar to using the dot product to separate terms. The usual
c_{nlm} = \int \psi^*_{nlm} u(r, \theta, \phi)~ d \tau

For example, the constant term is going deal with \psi _{000} since there are no radial or angular terms. But even \psi _{000} is going to contain a e^{-Zr/a_0} factor (assuming a Hydrogen-like wavefunction for the radial part) and there is no exponential factor in your function.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
I'm a bit confused about this one. The problem is very similar to using the dot product to separate terms. The usual
c_{nlm} = \int \psi^*_{nlm} u(r, \theta, \phi)~ d \tau

For example, the constant term is going deal with \psi _{000} since there are no radial or angular terms. But even \psi _{000} is going to contain a e^{-Zr/a_0} factor (assuming a Hydrogen-like wavefunction for the radial part) and there is no exponential factor in your function.

-Dan

I am confuse too. I am not sure what I am supposed to do but that is the question verbatim.
 
dwsmith said:
I am confuse too. I am not sure what I am supposed to do but that is the question verbatim.
I figure it out.
 
dwsmith said:
I figure it out.
I'm curious about your solution. Could you post the general idea? (I had a thought this morning about expanding the "missing" exponential. I'm wondering if that was the right approach.)

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
I'm curious about your solution. Could you post the general idea? (I had a thought this morning about expanding the "missing" exponential. I'm wondering if that was the right approach.)

-Dan

I also had to use the spherical harmonics of the solution which wasn't apparent to me by the questions wording.

We ca expand our series out term by term
\begin{alignat*}{3}
u(r,\theta,\varphi) & = & \sum_{\ell = 0}^2\sum_{m = -\ell}^{\ell} A_{\ell,m}Y^m_{\ell}(\theta,\varphi).
\end{alignat*}
For $\ell = 0$, we have that $u(r,\theta,\varphi) = 25$.
For $\ell = 1$, we have that $u(r,\theta,\varphi) = 25 + r\frac{75}{\sqrt{2}}\sin\theta\frac{e^{i\varphi} + e^{-i\varphi}}{2}$.
Lastly, for $\ell = 2$, we have
$$
u(r,\theta,\varphi) = 25 + \frac{75r}{\sqrt{2}}\sin\theta\cos\varphi + \frac{125r^2}{\pi}\sin^2\theta\cos 2\varphi = 25 + \frac{75\sqrt{2}}{2}r\sin\theta\cos\phi + \frac{125}{\pi}r^2\sin^2\theta\cos 2\phi.
$$
That is, we can approximate $u(r,\theta,\varphi)$ when $\ell = 0,1,2$ to be
$$
u(r,\theta,\phi)\simeq 25 + \frac{75\sqrt{2}}{2}r\sin\theta\cos\phi + \frac{125}{\pi}r^2\sin^2\theta\cos 2\phi.
$$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top