Arc-length integral with curve giving extremal value

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around expressing the arc-length of a curve defined in three-dimensional space using polar coordinates, specifically with the equations x = r cos(θ), y = r sin(θ), and z = f(r), where f(r) is infinitely differentiable. Participants are exploring the correct formulation of the arc-length differential and its implications for the problem at hand.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the expression for the arc-length differential ds and whether the initial formulation is correct. There are attempts to derive the correct expression using the chain rule and Cartesian coordinates. Questions arise regarding the relationship between derivatives and parameterization with respect to θ.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and corrections regarding the formulation of ds. Some guidance has been offered on the use of the chain rule and the implications of parameterization. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly concerning the dimensionality of the problem and the nature of the parameterization.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion regarding the parameterization with respect to θ as opposed to other parameters, and there is acknowledgment of differing conventions in notation and derivative expressions. Some references to external resources are made, indicating a search for clarity on the topic.

Leb
Messages
87
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


View attachment B3.bmp
For whoever does not want to read the attached problem:

Firstly, I need to express the arc-length from given [itex]x=r\cos\theta, y=r\sin\theta z = f(r), \text{ where } f(r) \text{ is an infinitely differentiable function and } r=r(\theta) \text{ i.e. parameter is } \theta[/itex] I begin with expressing it as [itex]ds = \sqrt{ r^{2} + r'^{2} + f'^{2} }[/itex] is that correct ?

I then need to show that the solutions of those curves are given by:
[itex]r ' ^{2} = r^{2}\frac{\left( \frac{r^{2}}{C} - 1\right)}{1 + f ' ^{2)}}[/itex]

Homework Equations



Lagrangian is independent of theta in this case, so I think I can use
[itex]\frac{d}{d\theta}\left( L - r' \frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{r'}} \right) = 0[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution

Using the above, the term in parenthesis is equal to a constant. Differentiating L w.r.t. r' and rearranging I get [itex]r'^{2} = \frac{r^{4}+2f'^{2}r^{2} + f'^{4}-Br^{2} - Bf'{2}}{B}[/itex] where B is a constant. I thought that this uses the good old multiply by "1" trick, but when I tried it it got no cancellations.

I can see the [itex]r^{2}\left( \frac{r^{2}}{C} - 1\right)[/itex] term in there, but do not know how to get the rest...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the line element ds the following is true ##ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2##. Since your curve is on a surface parametrized by ##r## and ##\theta##, and since ##r## itself is a function of ##\theta##, you should end up with ##ds = g(\theta)d\theta##.
 
Thanks for the reply !
Do you mean I should express [itex]\frac{df}{d\theta} \text{ as } \frac{df}{dr}\frac{dr}{d\theta}[/itex] ?
 
What I mean is that the expression for ds you got is incorrect. You can derive the correct equation from the expression for ds in the Cartesian coordinates by using the chain rule.
 
[tex] ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2<br /> = (d(r \cos \theta))^2 + (d(r \sin \theta))^2 + (d(f(r)))^2<br /> = (dr \cos \theta - r \sin \theta d\theta)^2<br /> + (dr \sin \theta + r \cos \theta d\theta)^2<br /> + (f'dr)^2<br /> \\<br /> = dr^2 + r^2 d\theta^2 + f'^2 dr^2<br /> = (1 + f'^2)dr^2 + r^2d\theta^2<br /> \\<br /> = (1 + f'^2)(dr(\theta))^2 + r^2d\theta^2<br /> = (1 + f'^2)(r'd\theta)^2 + r^2d\theta^2<br /> = ((1 + f'^2)r'^2 + r^2)d\theta^2<br /> \\<br /> ds = \sqrt {(1 + f'^2)r'^2 + r^2}d\theta[/tex]
 
Thanks for taking the time to type that, but if we parameterize w.r.t. theta, why do we have d \theta ?
 
Parametrized by ## \theta ## means that the length is a function of ## \theta ##: ## s = s(\theta) ##, thus ## ds = s'd\theta ##.
 
So I take it that the previous link is rubbish ? Thanks again !
 
  • #10
No, it is not rubbish. If you look carefully, the formula I derived equals their formula if f = const. Your problem has three dimensions, not two as they have.
 
  • #11
Last edited:
  • #12
Why should it disappear? Take a very simple example: ## y = x^2 ##. You can say that "y is parametrized by x". Then ## dy = 2x dx ##; x does not disappear. Even if ## y = x ##, you still have ## dy = dx ##.
 
  • #13
Well, I am a numpty and always had particular trouble with notation of derivatives and using the "implicit" chain rule.

Anyway, thanks very much for bothering to reply !
 
  • #15
Hehe, reparametrization... I always viewed the parameters as an "arbitrary" choice when we are talking about simple curvy curves (not circles or ellipses).

Thanks for the link !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K