I Are All Particle-Rest Inertial Frames the Same?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter PFfan01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frames Inertial
PFfan01
Messages
88
Reaction score
2
According to special relativity, all inertial frames of reference are equivalent for descriptions of physical phenomena. Suppose that there is a free particle in free space. Observed in any of the frames, the motion of particle can be described by a velocity, and by Lorentz boost, one can get a particle-rest frame where the particle is at rest. My question is: Are all the particle-rest frames the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All inertial frames are the same in special relativity, by hypothesis. It's one of the postulates of relativity.
 
Sorry, I did not make it clear. What I mean is: Are all the particle-rest frame the same inertial frame? There are no space rotations (corresponding to space orthogonal transformation) between these particle-rest frames?
 
You are free to rotate axes, so if I understand your question, there are infinitely many frames in which the particle is at rest. They use different spatial axes but share a timelike axis.
 
PFfan01 said:
Sorry, I did not make it clear. What I mean is: Are all the particle-rest frame the same inertial frame? There are no space rotations (corresponding to space orthogonal transformation) between these particle-rest frames?

I suspect you might be misunderstanding "equivalent" in this context. Different inertial frames are not equivalent. The posulates of SR are 1) that the speed of light is the same in all inertial reference frames; and, 2) the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames.

But, if two particles are moving with respect to each other then their rest frames cannot be the same.
 

Thread 'A sufficient condition for integrability of equation ##\nabla g=0##'

In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
View full post »
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
View full post »

Thread 'Hawking After 54 Years Confirmed: BH surfaces don't shrink'

Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Transformation Riemann tensor to an accelerating frame
Replies
10
Views
1K
I Is an accelerating frame the same as an inertial frame at a point?
Replies
11
Views
2K
B A difficulty with the equivalence of all inertial reference frames
Replies
28
Views
3K
I Locally Inertial Frames: Freefall & Relative Velocities
Replies
26
Views
2K
I Inertial reference frame and Bondi k-calculus
Replies
7
Views
1K
I SR textbooks discussing accelerated reference frames without delving into GR
Replies
36
Views
4K
I About inertial reference frames and logical deduction
Replies
26
Views
3K
A Does the EP imply that a free-falling observer follows a geodesic?
Replies
3
Views
509
I About global inertial frames in GR
2
Replies
78
Views
7K
I Galilean relativity in terms of homogeneity
2
Replies
51
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top