Are all (q) prime ideals in Z(\rho)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter learningphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Primes Rings
learningphysics
Homework Helper
Messages
4,097
Reaction score
7
This is the last question in Elements of Abstract Algebra by Allan Clark.

When is (q) a prime ideal in Z(\rho) (the Kummer ring) where \rho = e^{2\pi i /p}, where p and q are rational primes.

This seems to be a difficult question to answer in general... since considerable effort goes into answering for p =3 alone in the book.

I think we need x^{p-1} + x^{p-2} + x^{p-3} + ... + 1 to be irreducible over Zq - ring of integers mod q (they show this result specifically for Z(w) the kummer ring for p=3 which I'm generalizing here for all primes... hope I'm correct)...
is there any more we can say immediately without going into specific cases of q ?

Appreciate any help or hints. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the case in which ##\mathbb{Z}[\rho]/q\cdot \mathbb{Z}[\rho]## is no integral domain, i.e. ##(q)## no prime ideal. Then there have to be elements ##a=a_0+a_1\rho+\ldots+a_{p-1}\rho^{p-1}\, , \,b=b_0+b_1\rho+\ldots+b_{p-1}\rho^{p-1}## such that ##a\cdot b \in (q)##, i.e. ##q\,|\,a\cdot b##.

All other ##(q)## are then prime ideals.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top