Are Camera Flashes Deadly? Shocking Truth Behind Fatal Camera Incidents

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Didiyy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Camera Flash
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential dangers of camera flashes, particularly in relation to incidents where individuals may have been harmed or killed while using cameras near high-voltage areas. Participants explore various scenarios and historical contexts regarding the safety of camera flashes.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant recounts a story of a person killed by a camera flash while near a high-voltage substation, questioning the plausibility of electric current traveling through the camera to the body.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism, labeling the story as "total nonsense" and demanding credible sources for such claims.
  • A different participant mentions a related incident involving an Indian student and suggests that the details regarding the voltage involved are unclear.
  • One participant references historical flash photography methods, suggesting that early techniques involving magnesium powder could have posed risks near high-voltage lines.
  • Another participant doubts that modern cameras could cause such incidents, speculating about the possibility of a stroke instead.
  • One participant proposes a scenario where a malfunctioning camera flash could potentially deliver an electric shock through sweat and cracks in the camera casing, especially if the photographer has a pre-existing heart condition.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity of the original claim regarding camera flashes being deadly. Multiple competing views remain, with some expressing skepticism and others suggesting historical contexts or alternative explanations.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the mechanics of electric shock, the historical context of flash photography, and the specific conditions under which such incidents might occur. The discussion includes speculative scenarios that are not definitively established.

Didiyy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
killed by camera flash??!

i've read a story from somewhere. a guy was trying to take photos using his camera. unfortunately he was standing near a high-voltage substation. once the camera flashed,
he was killed immediately. they said that the electric current flows trough the camera flash to his body. is this true? how can this be possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Didiyy said:
i've read a story from somewhere. a guy was trying to take photos using his camera. unfortunately he was standing near a high-voltage substation. once the camera flashed,
he was killed immediately. they said that the electric current flows trough the camera flash to his body. is this true? how can this be possible?

Sounds like total nonsense to me
 


"I've read a story somewhere" is not an acceptable source. You have to point us to it if you want to discuss it.
 


The origin of this seems to be an Indian student who climbed onto the top of a train in order to photograph a group of friends, after that it becomes confusing as to the voltage of the cables that killed him. Google camera flash death.
 


Didiyy said:
i've read a story from somewhere. a guy was trying to take photos using his camera. unfortunately he was standing near a high-voltage substation. once the camera flashed,
he was killed immediately. they said that the electric current flows trough the camera flash to his body. is this true? how can this be possible?
Welcome to physics forums, Didiyy! http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/8645/mythbusterssmiley.gif

To my mind the story has credibility—providing it happened maybe 60 or more years ago. In the early days of flash photography the camera operator ignited a pan of magnesium powder to generate an intense flash of light. Ignition was almost explosive and threw up a cloud of white oxide, together with unignited magnesium dust. If this cloud were to envelop high voltage overhead lines there may be a flash over through the magnesium cloud to ground, and with the camera operator holding the ground electrode (aka, flash pan) high in his upheld hand, he would not stand a chance. He would have to be unlucky, certainly, but igniting flares or flash pans in the vicinity of early substations could conceivably be recklessly tempting fate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


I doubt anything like that could have occurred with a modern day camera; unless they had a stroke. I don't know.
 


I think it more likely touching the high voltage line generated a flash or perhaps even triggered the camera/flash?
 


Don't some electronic camera flashes use some pretty stout capacitors? Consider this scenerio...

The camera has been dropped, it's case is cracked in multiple locations. The day is hot causing the photographer to sweat. Sweat seeps into the cracks and contacts circuitry for the flash in 2 places. The photographer is holding the camera with both hands. When the flash goes off current from the capacitor travels through the sweat/cracks in the case to one hand, up the arm, across the chest, back down the other arm and back into the camera through another crack. Perhaps the photographer has a pace-maker or other heart condition which makes him more susceptible to electric shock.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
Replies
23
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K