Are Constraints Necessary in Hamiltonian Dynamics?

AI Thread Summary
The Hamiltonian method allows for the treatment of systems with constraints, but these constraints must be included in the final calculations for the equations of motion. Ignoring constraints can lead to incorrect results, as they play a crucial role in defining the system's dynamics. The initial confusion stemmed from a misunderstanding of the method's application. Clarification was provided that constraints are indeed essential in the Hamiltonian framework. Ultimately, the importance of including constraints in calculations was reaffirmed.
oldspice1212
Messages
149
Reaction score
2
Hi there,

I'm reading on the hamiltonian method and it says we can ignore constraints? Is this true, or am I missing something here, so if we have a constraint in the system we do not have to include it in the final calculation for the equation of motion?

Hope someone could clear this up, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would be beneficial if you gave a reference and a verbatim quote of the statement. Otherwise we are stabbing in the dark.
 
Nvm, I was wrong! Thanks anyways, we do include the constrain!
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
View full post »

Thread 'Do electron density waves accompany EM waves in coaxial cables?'

Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Solving this non-holonomic system using Dirac-Bergmann theory
Replies
4
Views
2K
A Hamilton's Method with Lagrange Equation and Constraint
Replies
1
Views
1K
A Extending Hamilton's principle to systems with constraints
Replies
17
Views
3K
B Lagrangrian and Hamiltonian mechanics: A historical picture
Replies
7
Views
3K
Why is Hamilton's Principle assumed to be valid for non-holonomic systems?
Replies
25
Views
3K
I Lagrangian with constraint forces
Replies
4
Views
2K
I What is the relationship between the Hamiltonian and Lorentz invariance?
Replies
6
Views
3K
On constraint forces and d'Alembert's Principle
Replies
1
Views
3K
I Boltzmann equation and Hamiltonian
Replies
2
Views
1K
Hamiltonian Method: Getting Final Equation of Motion
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top