Are dark energy and dark matter the same?

AI Thread Summary
Dark energy and dark matter are fundamentally different concepts, despite their similar names. Dark matter addresses the discrepancy in mass observed in galaxies, while dark energy explains the accelerated expansion of the universe. Dark matter is considered a form of matter influenced by gravity, whereas dark energy is a theoretical construct that does not behave like physical matter. While both can be categorized as forms of matter and energy, they do not equate through mass-energy equivalence. Ultimately, dark energy is characterized as repulsive, while dark matter is affected by gravitational forces.
clarinets
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Someone said that they are by mass-energy equivalence. Also, is it possible to say that dark matter is a indeed a form of matter, and dark energy is a form of energy?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
No. Dark Energy and Dark Matter are two entirely different concepts that are related only by their similar names.

Dark Matter is a proposed solution to a problem with a lot of observational support that galaxies have more mass than our models show.

Dark Energy is term to describe several theories that strive to explain why the expansion of the universe is accelerating.

It is however correct (probably, assuming the little we know about these things is true) to say that dark matter is a form of matter and dark energy is a form of energy, although I am more hesitant to say the latter. This does not mean they are the same via mass-energy equivalence.
 
Ok, thanks, that's what I thought.
 
In short, dark energy is repulsive (avoids matter and floats in contact with gravity) and dark matter only is affected by gravitational influence and exerts it
 
sciencestar said:
In short, dark energy is repulsive (avoids matter and floats in contact with gravity) and dark matter only is affected by gravitational influence and exerts it


Uh ... what does that mean, if anything?
 
sciencestar said:
In short, dark energy is repulsive (avoids matter and floats in contact with gravity) and dark matter only is affected by gravitational influence and exerts it

This is not correct. First, energy is not a physical object that responds to forces. It is a quantity that things such as matter and light have. Second, dark energy is the theorized reason for the acceleration of the expansion of the universe.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top