Are diffraction patterns additive?

  • Thread starter izzor
  • Start date
  • #1
4
0
Lets say I have three surfaces, one with pattern A, one with pattern B and the third with A and B overlapped. Will the diffraction pattern be a simple addition of the diffraction patterns from A and B?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #3
blue_leaf77
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2,629
784
Suppose the transmissivities of surface ##A## and ##B## are ##t_A(x,y)## and ##t_B(x,y)##, respectively. For far-field diffraction, the diffracted field is proportional to the Fourier transform of the objects transmissivity. One can then write for the relations between the diffracted fields with the corresponding transmissivity
$$
\begin{aligned}
u_A(u,v) \propto \textrm{FT}[t_A(x,y)] \\
u_B(u,v) \propto \textrm{FT}[t_B(x,y)]
\end{aligned}
$$
If the two surfaces are overlapped, provided the thickness of each surfaces is much smaller than the wavelength, the total transmissivity can be modeled as the product between the individual ones. Thus ##t_{tot}(x,y) = t_A(x,y)t_B(x,y)##. Following convolution theorem, the diffracted field of the overlapping surfaces will be proportional to the convolution between ##u_A(u,v)## and ##u_B(u,v)##, thus
$$
u_{tot}(x,y) = u_A \ast u_B
$$.
 

Related Threads on Are diffraction patterns additive?

  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
638
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Top