Are F and G intersections and unions always σ-fields in set theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alexsandro
  • Start date Start date
Alexsandro
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Can someone help me with this question ?

Let F and G be σ-fields os subsets of S.

(a) Let H = F intersection G be the collection of subsets of S lying in both F and G. Show that H is a σ-field.

(b) Show that F union G, the collection of subsets of S lying in either F or G, is not necessarilt a σ-field.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(a) show that the intersection of two closed sets is a closed set (e.g. "closed under complements").

(b) counterexample: Let f be an element of F and g be an element of G. Suppose f U g is neither in F nor in G, therefore not in H. This means H is not closed under union.

P.S. Let S = {1,2,3}, F = {S, ø, {1}, {2,3}}, G = {S, ø, {2}, {1,3}}. Then F U G = {S, ø, {1}, {2,3}, {2}, {1,3}}. If H = F U G was σ, then it would be closed under union, which implies that {1} U {2} = {1,2} would be a distinct element of H. Since it is not, H is not σ.
 
Last edited:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top