Are Fermions and Bosons Responsible for the Force Behind a Punch?

robertroman10
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Just wondering...

If the interactions between fermions are the emittance of a boson (from what I understand from the grand design book by stephen hawking) then when you punch someone, is it just high levels of bosons being emmited and clashing or are the actual boson particles colliding?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Contact forces are the result of the electromagnetic interaction. It's probably easiest and most appropriate to understand contact forces as arising from the electrostatic repulsion of the electrons in the atoms on the surfaces of the two objects in contact. From the viewpoint of QFT, these static fields can be understood as virtual photons being exchanged by the electrons.
 


So its just photons being distributed?
 


Not exactly. There is an obvious "back momentum" effect.
Else a result of impact could never happen.

Because of the electromagnetic interaction, the force "wave" propogates at the speed of sound in that material.
 


So does this "back momentum" explain why someone with more muscle would punch harder, as they would be able to put more back momentum into their swing?
 


robertroman10 said:
So does this "back momentum" explain why someone with more muscle would punch harder, as they would be able to put more back momentum into their swing?

More muscle allows (generally) more force to be put into a punch and quicker acceleration. The increase equals a harder punch.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top