Are galaxies of antimatter identifiable?

AI Thread Summary
Galaxies composed of antimatter cannot be distinguished from those made of ordinary matter using spectroscopic methods due to the nature of photons. Since photons are their own antiparticles, antimatter emits antiphotons that are indistinguishable from regular photons. This means that the electromagnetic waves emitted by antimatter galaxies would appear identical to those from matter galaxies. Consequently, there is no optical method available to differentiate between the two types of galaxies. The discussion highlights the fundamental challenge in identifying cosmic antimatter.
Leo Klem
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
12 August 2009

My question relates to the search for antimatter in the cosmic space. As far as many laymen know, the composition of the material ingredients of galaxies is detected through spectroscopic analysis (i.e. through the analysis of the electromagnetic waves emitted).
Considering that antimatter consists of leptons and hadrons that substantially differ from the corresponding components of the ordinary matter only because of the respective electrical charges, is there any special reason that makes spectroscopic methods distinguish galaxies of matter from galaxies of antimatter?
In simpler words, can galaxies consisting of atoms of antimatter (in electrical equilibrium) be optically distinguished from galaxies made of ordinary matter?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
No, because a photon is its own antiparticle. In other words, even if antimatter emits antiphotons, we can't tell the difference because an antiphoton IS a photon just like the ones we know and love.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top