Are grad school admissions offices generally horrible at replying to emails?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Graduate school admissions offices often exhibit poor email response rates, with one user reporting only a 20% reply rate. The discussion highlights that admissions staff are typically overwhelmed with inquiries, leading to delayed or non-existent responses. It is suggested that applicants should apply to multiple schools to mitigate the risk of rejection due to unaddressed questions. Additionally, while calling admissions offices may yield better results, it is recommended to wait a few days after emailing before making a call.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of graduate school application processes
  • Familiarity with email communication etiquette
  • Knowledge of how to effectively phrase questions for clarity
  • Awareness of the importance of applying to multiple institutions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research effective email strategies for graduate school inquiries
  • Learn about the typical timelines for graduate school admissions responses
  • Explore alternative communication methods with admissions offices
  • Investigate common reasons for graduate school application rejections
USEFUL FOR

Prospective graduate students, academic advisors, and anyone navigating the graduate school application process will benefit from this discussion.

Simfish
Gold Member
Messages
811
Reaction score
2
And if so, what other routes have you tried? Does calling them usually work?

I've emailed a lot of grad school admission offices, but I generally get horrible reply rates (as in, I usually only get around 1 reply for every 5 emails). I do try to keep my questions short and simple.

Here's an example of an email I sent to the MIT EAPS department (http://eapsweb.mit.edu/contact.html):

"Hello,

I'm an undergrad who's interested in applying for the EAPS program this year. I have some questions about the "list your textbooks" part of the application.

(1) I took the Atmos 552 course at the University of Washington, and it didn't use a textbook. It did use course notes at http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~dennis/552_Notes_ftp.html, however. Is it okay if I could cite the URL to the course notes instead?
(2) Is it okay if I list textbooks that I self-studied from? Or texts that I used as supplementary texts for a course I took?

Thanks!"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Simfish said:
And if so

Yes, they are. You're e-mail is one of hundreds they get.

I'm an undergrad who's interested in applying for the EAPS program this year. I have some questions about the "list your textbooks" part of the application.

The problem with that e-mail is that the answer is likely to be "no one knows since we haven't thought about it." The person that gets your e-mail is likely to be some overworked staffer that has a thousand other things to do. If they want an authoritative answer they have to contact an equally overworked professor that has never really thought about the question.

You may indeed find yourself in a situation in which your application gets canned because of something really stupid, but that's life, and that's why you need to apply to multiple schools. The odds of your application getting rejected somewhere for some really stupid reason is high, but the odds of your application getting rejected *everywhere* for some really stupid reason is low.
 
Ah thanks. Those are definitely good points, so I'll just leave it into increase the variance in my outcomes then.
 
Simfish said:
And if so, what other routes have you tried? Does calling them usually work?

I've emailed a lot of grad school admission offices, but I generally get horrible reply rates (as in, I usually only get around 1 reply for every 5 emails). I do try to keep my questions short and simple.

Yes, you can try calling as well, but I wouldn't unless its really urgent, and if so, then call until at least a few days have passed. I usually got most of my emails replied to within a couple days.

I have some questions about the "list your textbooks" part of the application.

(1) I took the Atmos 552 course at the University of Washington, and it didn't use a textbook. It did use course notes at http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~dennis/552_Notes_ftp.html, however. Is it okay if I could cite the URL to the course notes instead?
(2) Is it okay if I list textbooks that I self-studied from? Or texts that I used as supplementary texts for a course I took?

Thanks!"

I don't think they'll consider it ok to list textbooks you self-studied from. For me, I just left it blank or mentioned 'no textbook' if we didn't use one. I doubt that played a factor in any of the rejections I got
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K