Are grad school admissions offices generally horrible at replying to emails?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the responsiveness of graduate school admissions offices to email inquiries, particularly regarding the application process and specific questions about listing textbooks. Participants share their experiences and strategies for obtaining information from these offices.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants report low reply rates to emails sent to grad school admissions offices, with one noting a ratio of about 1 reply for every 5 emails.
  • One participant suggests that the admissions staff may be overwhelmed with inquiries, leading to delayed or absent responses.
  • There is a concern that admissions staff may not have definitive answers to specific questions, as they might need to consult professors who are also busy.
  • Another participant mentions that calling admissions offices could be an alternative, but advises against it unless the matter is urgent.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about whether it is acceptable to list self-studied textbooks or supplementary texts in applications, with one suggesting that leaving the section blank might be a safer option.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that admissions offices have poor response rates, but there is no consensus on the best approach to take when seeking information. Opinions vary on the acceptability of listing certain types of textbooks in applications.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of confidence regarding the impact of textbook listings on application outcomes, with some indicating that it may not significantly affect decisions.

Simfish
Gold Member
Messages
811
Reaction score
2
And if so, what other routes have you tried? Does calling them usually work?

I've emailed a lot of grad school admission offices, but I generally get horrible reply rates (as in, I usually only get around 1 reply for every 5 emails). I do try to keep my questions short and simple.

Here's an example of an email I sent to the MIT EAPS department (http://eapsweb.mit.edu/contact.html):

"Hello,

I'm an undergrad who's interested in applying for the EAPS program this year. I have some questions about the "list your textbooks" part of the application.

(1) I took the Atmos 552 course at the University of Washington, and it didn't use a textbook. It did use course notes at http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~dennis/552_Notes_ftp.html, however. Is it okay if I could cite the URL to the course notes instead?
(2) Is it okay if I list textbooks that I self-studied from? Or texts that I used as supplementary texts for a course I took?

Thanks!"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Simfish said:
And if so

Yes, they are. You're e-mail is one of hundreds they get.

I'm an undergrad who's interested in applying for the EAPS program this year. I have some questions about the "list your textbooks" part of the application.

The problem with that e-mail is that the answer is likely to be "no one knows since we haven't thought about it." The person that gets your e-mail is likely to be some overworked staffer that has a thousand other things to do. If they want an authoritative answer they have to contact an equally overworked professor that has never really thought about the question.

You may indeed find yourself in a situation in which your application gets canned because of something really stupid, but that's life, and that's why you need to apply to multiple schools. The odds of your application getting rejected somewhere for some really stupid reason is high, but the odds of your application getting rejected *everywhere* for some really stupid reason is low.
 
Ah thanks. Those are definitely good points, so I'll just leave it into increase the variance in my outcomes then.
 
Simfish said:
And if so, what other routes have you tried? Does calling them usually work?

I've emailed a lot of grad school admission offices, but I generally get horrible reply rates (as in, I usually only get around 1 reply for every 5 emails). I do try to keep my questions short and simple.

Yes, you can try calling as well, but I wouldn't unless its really urgent, and if so, then call until at least a few days have passed. I usually got most of my emails replied to within a couple days.

I have some questions about the "list your textbooks" part of the application.

(1) I took the Atmos 552 course at the University of Washington, and it didn't use a textbook. It did use course notes at http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~dennis/552_Notes_ftp.html, however. Is it okay if I could cite the URL to the course notes instead?
(2) Is it okay if I list textbooks that I self-studied from? Or texts that I used as supplementary texts for a course I took?

Thanks!"

I don't think they'll consider it ok to list textbooks you self-studied from. For me, I just left it blank or mentioned 'no textbook' if we didn't use one. I doubt that played a factor in any of the rejections I got
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K