Are Independence and Disjoint Events the Same in Probability?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikeyman2010
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stats
AI Thread Summary
Independence and disjoint events are distinct concepts in probability. In the given scenario, the calculation of 0.24 x 0.15 does not yield the correct percentage of laborers with 4 years of college because the events are not independent. While both answers regarding the relationship between the events are technically correct, the lack of independence is the more relevant explanation for the incorrect conclusion. Understanding that independent events allow for the multiplication of probabilities, while disjoint events cannot occur simultaneously, clarifies the confusion. This distinction is essential for accurate probability calculations and interpretations.
mikeyman2010
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a question which requires you to understand the difference between Independence and disjoint events. The question is: Suppose 24% of a population have 4 years of college, and 15% are laborers/workers. From this, can you conclude that 0.24 x 0.15 = 0.036=3.6% of the population are laborers or workers who had 4 years of college?

a) No, because the two events are not mutually exclusive (Disjoint Events).
b) No, because the two events are not independent.

My teacher says that technically, the two answers are right, but one explains the question give better than the other. Can anyone explain to me why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's something I have learned when I am young. I don't think it is a stat. question.
For 10 people, 1 learned Eng. ,1 learned Maths
Can you conclude that only 1 people have studied before?
 
but then what is the difference between independence and disjoint events?
 
primaryguns response is completely meaningless- ignore it.

One of the things you should have learned in statistics is:

"If A and B are independent events then Prob(A and B)= Prob(A)*prob(B)".

Thus, "No because A and B are not independent" is more relevant than "No because A and B are not mutually disjoint". It happens that A and B are NOT mutually disjoint but that is not the reason the statement is untrue.
 
HallsofIvy said:
primaryguns response is completely meaningless- ignore it.

OOOO Harsh :-D
 
Hey, it was just a warning to "mikeyman2010".
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
6K
Back
Top