Are Individual Normals Irrelevant in Solving a Pulley and Wedge System?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the incorrect analysis of a pulley and wedge system, particularly regarding the acceleration of mass M when the incline angle θ is zero. Participants highlight that the initial conclusion about acceleration being a negative value is flawed, as there is a net horizontal force acting on the masses due to tension in the string. Clarifications are made about the fixed wall's role in the setup and the handling of normal forces between the masses. The conversation also touches on using Lagrangian mechanics for a more straightforward solution, emphasizing the importance of accurately representing forces in free body diagrams. Ultimately, the need for a correct understanding of the forces involved is reiterated to arrive at a valid solution.
  • #31
Differentiate it said:
I believe in my equation
Mgsinθ - T +N' - N'
I have taken gravity into account
No, you have pretended the bar is:

1) Horizontal in the sleeve
2) Squeeze fit into the sleeve so that it is contacting both sides.

Rotate that assembly by 90 degrees...do those Normal forces change?

Now accelerate that assembly like an elevator...did they change again?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
erobz said:
No, you have pretended the bar is:

1) Horizontal in the sleeve
2) Squeeze fit into the sleeve so that it is contacting both sides.

Rotate that assembly by 90 degrees...do those Normal forces change?

Now accelerate that assembly like an elevator...did they change again?
Did I not mention that? Yeah, it's contacting both sides and is horizontal in the sleeve
 
  • #33
Differentiate it said:
Did I not mention that? Yeah, it's contacting both sides and is horizontal in the sleeve
But its not horizontal in this problem. It is rotated from horizontal by the angle ##\theta##, and it is accelerating down the incline at ##a##.
 
  • #34
erobz said:
But its not horizontal in this problem. It is rotated from horizontal by the angle ##\theta##, and it is accelerating down the incline at ##a##.
Well yes, but how does that affect the normal forces exerted by it on M?
 
  • #35
Differentiate it said:
Well yes, but how does that affect the normal forces exerted by it on M?
You won't need to worry about that to solve the problem, but you can figure that out after if you like once you have the proper set of equations.
 
  • #36
erobz said:
You won't need to worry about that to solve the problem, but you can figure that out after if you like once you have the proper set of equations.
So what you're telling me is that the 2 normal forces exerted are not equal? Why?
 
  • #37
Differentiate it said:
So what you're telling me is that the 2 normal forces exerted are not equal? Why?
For two reasons. a portion of the pistons own weight is contributing to the lower normal and its accelerating down the incline, which has an opposite effect, but not necessarily exactly offsetting for all accelerations.
 
  • #38
erobz said:
For two reasons. a portion of the pistons own weight is contributing to the lower normal and its accelerating down the incline, which has an opposite effect, but not necessarily exactly offsetting for all accelerations.
Oh, so basically, one of the normals(acting up the incline) counters Mgsinθ and the other(acting down the incline) is the one contributing to the acceleration of M. Is that correct?
 
  • #39
Trust m
Differentiate it said:
Oh, so basically, one of the normals(acting up the incline) counters Mgsinθ and the other(acting down the incline) is the one contributing to the acceleration of M. Is that correct?
The thing is you don't need two Normals to solve this problem, but you must have at least 1 normal. It should be less confusing that way. Just assume the the pistion is just a tiny bit loose ( like a real one would be)
 
  • #40
erobz said:
Trust m

The thing is you don't need two Normals to solve this problem, but you must have at least 1 normal.
Alright, but last question, could you just confirm what i said in my previous reply?
Differentiate it said:
Oh, so basically, one of the normals(acting up the incline) counters Mgsinθ and the other(acting down the incline) is the one contributing to the acceleration of M. Is that correct?
 
  • #41
Differentiate it said:
Alright, but last question, could you just confirm what i said in my previous reply?
I don't think that's it. One of the Normals gets a portion of the small masses own weight added to it while the top doesn't.
 
  • Like
Likes Differentiate it
  • #42
erobz said:
All I can say is under the assumption of two normals ( meaning you forcefully squeezed that pistion in there) that is how the equations make it seem.
Ok alright 👍
 
  • #43
Differentiate it said:
Ok alright 👍
No see my edit. I've changed my mind since it seems like you are talking about it countering the sleeves weight. I didn't catch that at first
 
  • #44
How about just forget about the two normals for now and pretend its just a little loose in the slot ( like a real one). Put the normal on the lower side of the slot and solve the resulting equations.
 
  • #45
erobz said:
Trust m

The thing is you don't need two Normals to solve this problem, but you must have at least 1 normal. It should be less confusing that way. Just assume the the pistion is just a tiny bit loose ( like a real one would be)
Last question:
Could you please elaborate why the normal that is facing downwards is greater?
 
  • #46
Differentiate it said:
Could you please elaborate why the normal that is facing downwards is greater?
The incline is the reason. Its supporting some of its own weight because of the inclination.

If it were squeezed in there horizontal ( ## \theta = 0 ## ) the Normal forces ( what ever they may be from the "squeezing" - are equal ##N_l = N_u ## ), if you take it and rotate it lettting ## \theta = \frac{\pi}{2} ## the upper normal remains ##N_u## and the lower normal would be ##N_l+mg##

Anyhow, if this is all overly confusing you don't have to assume two Normals to solve this, but you better have at least 1.
 
Last edited:
  • #47
Differentiate it said:
Last question:
Could you please elaborate why the normal that is facing downwards is greater?
Consider the horizontal case. The only forces on the small mass with a horizontal component are those normal forces. If they were equal and opposite then the small mass would not move horizontally, yet the container clearly will accelerate to the right. Hence the left-hand normal force must be the greater.
Now, it is impossible to say exactly what the two normal forces are. If we make the fit a bit snugger then both normal forces increase by the same amount. These increases balance, so do not affect the motion. So you can safely assume that one of the normal forces is zero. Which one? Doesn’t matter. If you pick the wrong one the other will come out negative, but it makes no difference to the algebra and the result.
 
  • Like
Likes erobz
  • #48
The point is that the individual normals are irrelevant to the solution of the problem. They are both a force along the incline between the two masses so only their sum is relevant and you can treat just the sum. It doesn’t matter if the mass m is squeeze fitted or not as long as there is no internal friction.
 
  • Like
Likes erobz and jbriggs444

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
740
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
987
Replies
27
Views
2K