Are kinetic frictional forces always slowing down objects?

  • Thread starter Thread starter keltix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Kinetic
AI Thread Summary
Kinetic frictional forces are resistive and always act opposite to the direction of an object's motion, which typically results in slowing the object down. However, in specific scenarios, such as a box on an accelerating railroad flatcar, kinetic friction can cause the box to accelerate in the same direction as the motion of the flatcar. Despite this, kinetic friction always dissipates mechanical energy into thermal energy and opposes slipping between surfaces. In the example of the box, while it may appear to be moving forward, the friction force acts in the direction of the box's motion relative to the train. Overall, kinetic friction generally slows objects but can have complex interactions depending on the context.
keltix
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Do kinetic frictional forces always slow objects?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. By definition, kinetic frictional forces are resistive forces, and they act in a direction opposite of the motion of that object. As an example, you might think about a smooth block sitting on a steep, snow covered hill. You might imagine that the block will slide down the hill, and therefore, you might get confused, thinking that the frictional force is actually speeding up the object. In fact, it is the weight of the object which is causing it to speed up, and the frictional force indeed opposes this motion, albeit, in this example, perhaps with negligible strength.

Now, this answer corresponds to the classical concept/definition of friction. If you're talking about electromagnetic interaction or something like that when you say the word "friction", then that's a different matter.
 
Last edited:
keltix said:
Do kinetic frictional forces always slow objects?
Generally, yes, but not always. Imagine a box on the floor of a railroad flatcar which is accelerating faster than static friction can support. In that case, kinetic friction between the floor and the box will accelerate the box (until it slides off or bangs into a wall).

But kinetic friction always dissipates mechanical energy (transforming it into thermal energy). And it always acts to oppose slipping between surfaces. In the case of the box and the train, the box tends to slip backwards (with respect to the train) thus friction acts forwards. But viewed from the tracks, the friction force on the box points in the same direction as the box's motion.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top