Are MECOs the Solution to Galactic Black Hole Mysteries?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nereid
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential of Magnetospheric Eternally Collapsing Objects (MECOs) to explain galactic black hole candidates, referencing a new class of solutions to Einstein's field equations. Some participants express skepticism about the validity of these solutions, citing elementary errors in the related research. Questions arise regarding the peer-review status of the publications mentioned, particularly those from the American Physical Society. Additionally, there are concerns about the challenges faced in getting MECO-related research published in reputable journals. Overall, the conversation highlights ongoing debates about the observational compatibility of MECO models with existing astronomical data.
Nereid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
3,392
Reaction score
3
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006astro.ph..2453R".

From the abstract:
We show that the existence of intrinsically magnetic GBHC [galactic black hole candidates] is consistent with a new class of solutions of the Einstein field equations of General Relativity.
I suppose I should start a thread in the Relativity section, re how well the "new class of solutions of the Einstein field equations of General Relativity" holds water; here I'm interested in looking at how well the observational data matches MECO models.

Thoughts?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I've posted a brief comment on this paper in the GR forum. Basically, I'm not particuarly impressed with it, there appears to be some elementary errors. Unfortunately I cannot comment on the astronomical observation aspects.

Do you know if the journal this was published in was peer-reviewed?
 
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001APS..APRJ14014R" gives: "American Physical Society, April Meeting, April 28 - May 1, 2001 Washington, DC Bulletin of the American Physical Society, Vol. 46, No. 2, abstract #J14.014" (the title is slightly different).

or, still from http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004APS..APR.B8008L": "American Physical Society, April Meeting, 2004, May 1-4, 2004, Denver, Colorado April 2004, MEETING ID: APR04, abstract #B8.008" (the title is the same, but the abstract different).

There are, apparently, two preprints http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0307438" .

[Edit: from http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0505/0505518.pdf" (p2 Introduction):
Finally a full discussion of the entire observational and theoretical program for the ”Magnetospheric Eternally Collapsing Object (MECO) model of Galactic Black Hole Candidates and Active Galactic Nuclei” was published (Robertson and Leiter 2005) as chapter one in the book ”New Directions in Black Hole Research” recently published by Nova Science Publishers.
Looks like they're having some difficulty getting published, e.g. in ApJ.]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top