Are Muons and Tauons Higher-Dimensional KK Modes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MManuel Abad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modes Muons
MManuel Abad
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Muons and tauons as KK modes??

Hello, everybody:

I have (what I think is) a silly question. We all know that μ and τ particles are just as electrons, but with larger mass. Could it be that they are heavier Kaluza-Klein modes of the e in a higher dimensional theory, where the extra dimension is compactified?

I know I'm talking without mentioning a specific model (I don't know any), but I wonder if it is plausible or if there is a physical/mathematical argument against such a thing.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's an interesting question. The KK modes of a scalar field have masses given, in appropriate units, by roughly

$$ m_n^2 = m_0^2 + \left(\frac{n}{R}\right)^2,$$

where ##m_0## is the mass of the field in the higher dimensional theory, and ##R## is a characteristic length scale of the of the compact dimensions. For example, if there is one circular extra dimension, ##R## is the radius, but in some more complicated example it would be related to an appropriate root of the volume.

In your model, ##m_0 \sim m_e## and

$$ m_\mu^2 = m_e^2 + \frac{1}{R^2},$$

therefore

$$R \sim \frac{1}{106~\mathrm{MeV}} \sim 2 \cdot 10^{-15} ~\mathrm{m}.$$

So the extra dimensions would have to be of femtometer size, which is the same order of the size of the proton. Such a large scale extra dimension would have been seen in experiments and, in fact, the present limits on extra dimensions is that they have to be at least ##10^{-4}## times smaller than this value (##\sim 1 ~\mathrm{TeV}## in terms of energy scales).

There is an easy way to see that such large extra dimensions would be ruled out. Namely the other particles of the SM would have to have KK partners, so, for example, we would need a particle with the same quantum numbers as the photon with a mass almost equal to the muon mass. There is no such particle.
 
fzero said:
There is an easy way to see that such large extra dimensions would be ruled out. Namely the other particles of the SM would have to have KK partners, so, for example, we would need a particle with the same quantum numbers as the photon with a mass almost equal to the muon mass. There is no such particle.
For leptons, there should be particles with 2*muonmass-electronmass, 3*muonmass-2*electronmass and so on. Those particles are missing, and the tau does not even fit in that pattern.

In addition, I think the decays of the muon do not fit to that hypothesis.
 
That'll do! Thanks! It didn't occur to me to look for the size of the extra dimension...

Cheers
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top