Are Nuclear and Astronautical Engineering Worth Pursuing in Today's Job Market?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the viability of pursuing careers in nuclear and astronautical engineering, particularly in the context of current job market prospects and educational pathways. Participants explore concerns about the future of nuclear engineering, the necessary educational background for astronautical engineering, and the potential pay associated with these fields.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about the viability of a career in nuclear engineering due to negative prospects and the decline of nuclear plants in Germany.
  • Another participant suggests that many employed aeronautical engineers have backgrounds in mechanical engineering, indicating a potential pathway for those interested in astronautical engineering.
  • A participant shares personal experience, noting that nuclear engineers they met in the Navy had no trouble finding jobs after service, suggesting a positive job outlook from that perspective.
  • Some participants emphasize the importance of choosing a field based on personal engagement rather than solely on future pay prospects.
  • There is mention of the need to consider future job prospects when comparing similar engineering disciplines, highlighting a tension between passion and practicality in career choices.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the viability of nuclear engineering as a career, with some expressing concerns while others provide anecdotal evidence of job availability. There is also no agreement on the best educational pathway for astronautical engineering, as different backgrounds are mentioned.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying perspectives based on geographic context, particularly the difference between North American and European job markets in engineering fields.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals considering careers in engineering, particularly in nuclear or astronautical fields, as well as those interested in the job market dynamics of these disciplines.

Johnfranco21
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I am just months away from finishing High School and both, nuclear and astronautical engineering are the careers I am striving towards to. The thing is that I have read so many bad things and prospects for nuclear engineering, that I am not sure if it is a viable career. I want to study in Germany, but with the nuclear plants shooting down in 2020, is there still any point on studying nuclear engineering? I am convinced it is the energy of the future, but more and more countries are shying away from it

Also, if I were to study astronautical engineering, which other branch of engineering would I have to study first (mechanical or aeronautical)? How is the pay for nuclear engineers and astronautical engineers?

Is there any other career you would recommend me? I love physics and mathematics and I am pretty good with chemistry (although I don't love it too much). I am looking for a profession that will have a good pay and will definitely have a good future.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
Hey, I just read your post and was in a similar dilemma between engineering and computer science. While I was researching engineering I found most employed aeronautical engineers hold BA's in mechanical engineer degree's. It seemed as if you are positive you want to go into aeronautical it would be wiser to do so; however if you are still unsure the more vague mechanical engineering degree might be a more profitable idea. As far as Nuclear engineering goes, I was in the Navy for a few years and from my personal experience of meeting people that worked in the reactor, none had troubles finding jobs when they separated. Hope this helps! Oh by the way this is from a North American perspective, I noticed you specified college in Germany from your post.
 
A lot of astronautics engineers started out with aeronautics. I started out with physics. A friend of mine is a nuclear engineer, who originally did maths. My advice would be to study the one that engages you the most - not what you suspect will pay you more in 20 years time.
 
Ed said:
My advice would be to study the one that engages you the most - not what you suspect will pay you more in 20 years time.

That's good advice for comparing between (sometimes radically) different fields; however, for when comparing similar fields, e.g. different disciplines of engineering, future prospects is an important consideration.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K