Are Physics PhD Programs Overloaded With Courses?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bennington
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the perceived overwhelming number of physics courses required for a PhD, particularly referencing the extensive course offerings at MIT. It clarifies that while a comprehensive list exists, not all courses are mandatory, and students typically take 3 to 5 courses per semester for their undergraduate degree, with fewer courses required in later years. The conversation emphasizes that acquiring a PhD necessitates a broad knowledge base, often supplemented by self-study. Participants express that the abundance of courses can be exciting rather than daunting, and that students can tailor their course selections based on their interests and career goals. Additionally, some courses may be optional or not relevant to every student, suggesting that the course catalog may appear more extensive than what is actually required for graduation.
bennington
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Too much physics!

I was reading the physics courses http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/web/courses/courses/index.htm#Physics", and boy, I was shocked. If I were to get a PhD in physics, would I have to take that many courses?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
so much physics, so little time!
 
Definately not. One usually takes from 3 to 5 courses per semester, for 6 semester, than you get your BA degree. And after that, much less courses per year on average.
 
That is a complete list of all courses offered by MIT's Department of Physics. Not all are mandatory, and there isn't enough time to take every single course and to study every single area of physics in great detail. But getting a PhD does require you to know a lot of stuff. By that I mean you will eventually read a lot of stuff on your own and learn a lot outside of your courses.

However, I never thought of physics courses that way, even during my undergrad i was EXCITED to finally take some courses I found interesting (even though I had a lot of required courses).
 
You can't get TOO much physics ;-)
 
You'd better do it now, before physicists discover even more physics for you to take.

You think Einstein had to take Modern physics or Quantum Mechanics? Nope. So, the sooner you get it over with, the less you'll have to learn.

EDIT: Looked over the course list. It's not really that bad. Especially since some of them are "repeats" (same title, different year). And like others have said, a lot of those other courses are simply optional depending on what you want to do later in your career. I wouldn't take, for example, statistical physics in biology. I just don't see myself doing biology. It makes me squeemish. :( But instead I would take say the theory of solids classes.

Here is a list of physics classes offered at UW:

http://www.washington.edu/students/crscat/phys.html

A lot of those are graduate level, and a lot of those are total BS classes, like Phys 215 "A Way of Knowing.", so we would't be expected to take them.

The general list of classes you need to take to graduate with a BS degree, though, isn't that bad:

http://www.phys.washington.edu/bsrequirements.htm
 
Last edited:
Those catalogs also tend to end up bloated with courses that are offered once in a while, and some of them are annually, and some of them are targeted largely at non-physics majors...it's not really a representative sample of what actually ends up being available for you to choose from. Or of what you're expected to learn.
 
what is the point of this thread ?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
803
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Back
Top