Are Quantum Dots Unstable? - Paden Roder

PRodQuanta
Messages
341
Reaction score
0
Sandia National lab reported that quantum dots absorb near UV and re-emit at the visible range. It's wavelength shifts to a longer wavelength with 60% efficiency.

Does this mean quantum dots are unstable? Since they add mass to themselves. This makes them something different from what they were initially. I come to this conclusion that they add mass by the knowledge that the quantum dots absorb a high frequency photon and release a slower moving one.

Thoughts?
Paden Roder
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have the feeling the dots emit more low-frequency photons than they absorb high-frequency photons.

Also, all photons move at the same speed: c.

- Warren
 
What is a quantum dot?
 
An effectively zero-dimensional confinement apparatus for electrons.

- Warren
 
You know what I meant (or so I hope) when I said slower moving one. Lower frequency.
Paden Roder
 
The excess energy is converted to thermal (lattice vibrations), and ultimately coupled out through the surface to the surrounding medium.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
23K
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
382
Views
45K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top