Are small modular nuclear power plants the solution for remote locations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclear Plants
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the potential of small modular nuclear power plants, specifically the Hyperion Power Module, as a solution for providing energy in remote locations. Participants explore various technical aspects, operational models, and regulatory challenges associated with these reactors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that Hyperion's approach to small, compact nuclear systems is serious and not merely hype, comparing it to naval nuclear reactors that operate without frequent refueling.
  • Concerns are raised about the feasibility of rejecting significant amounts of heat from the reactor without a large water source or substantial heat exchangers.
  • Some propose that the Hyperion design could utilize a Brayton cycle or a combined Brayton-Rankine cycle for energy conversion and heat rejection.
  • There is speculation that rejected heat could be used for district heating or as process heat, and some conventional plants use dry forced-convection cooling systems.
  • Technical details about the Hyperion reactor's design, including its hydrogen-moderated and potassium-cooled system, are discussed, along with its operational characteristics and safety features.
  • Participants express skepticism about the timeline for regulatory approval from the NRC, noting that the design is unconventional and may face challenges in the approval process.
  • Questions arise regarding the handling of tritium and other radioisotopes in the reactor's operation, with some participants seeking clarification on the waste management processes compared to conventional reactors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of support and skepticism regarding the Hyperion reactor's viability and regulatory prospects. There is no consensus on the technical feasibility of certain operational aspects or the timeline for regulatory approval.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the current understanding of the reactor's heat rejection capabilities and waste management processes, as well as the uncertainties surrounding regulatory interactions with the NRC.

  • #31
TEPCO’s Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear station, which consists of seven (7) large BWRs, is the largest nuclear power generation facility in the world, licensed for 8,200 MWe (when all 7 are up and running).
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
Astronuc said:
TEPCO’s Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear station, which consists of seven (7) large BWRs, is the largest nuclear power generation facility in the world, licensed for 8,200 MWe (when all 7 are up and running).
Thanks Astronuc. That's a lot of power in one place. I note http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/nuclear_power_news/archive/2009/05/08/xtepco.aspx" :
All seven nuclear generators at Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant have been shut since a magnitude 6.8 quake hit the region in July 16, 2007. The least damaged No.7 unit would be the first of the seven to be restarted.
No doubt they are back up and running now, but to lose 8,200 MWe instantly from their grid like that must have been difficult. The threat of such a loss argues heavily against mammoth installations in my view, and in favor of smaller distributed power sources like the ones mentioned in this thread, especially for seismically active countries.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 110 ·
4
Replies
110
Views
20K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K