Are Some Atomic Orbitals From a 4D Wave Function?

Hornbein
Gold Member
Messages
3,420
Reaction score
2,804
"To visualize the standing waves (or orbitals) of electrons bound to a positively charged nucleus in three dimensions, we will need a four-dimensional plot of the wave function vs. x, y, and z."
http://www.grandinetti.org/electron-orbital-shapes"The wavefunctions in the N=2 family are vectors in an abstract four-dimensional space. This can also be called a function-space and/or a Hilbert space." http://www.av8n.com/physics/wavefunctions.htm

So, what are those dimensions and wave functions? This must be fairly basic.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure what the author means by "four-dimensional plot of the wave function vs. x, y, and z" in the first link. For the second link, the author has specifically considered the n=2 subspace of a hydrogenic atoms where the eigenstates are 4-fold degenerate (one in 2s and three in 2p), therefore the subspace of n=2 has a dimensionality of 4.
 
For the first link, it goes like this. If you want to represent a one-dimensional function f(x), you need to produce a two-dimensional plot. Likewise, a two-dimensional function f(x,y) will require a 3D plot. So to plot ##| \psi(x,y,z) |^2##, you would need to be in a 4D world, the 4th dimension representing the density at point (x,y,z). That's why you need other visualization techniques, such as shading. It has nothing to do with the wave function per se, but is true of any 3D function f(x,y,z).
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
DrClaude said:
For the first link, it goes like this. If you want to represent a one-dimensional function f(x), you need to produce a two-dimensional plot. Likewise, a two-dimensional function f(x,y) will require a 3D plot. So to plot ##| \psi(x,y,z) |^2##, you would need to be in a 4D world, the 4th dimension representing the density at point (x,y,z). That's why you need other visualization techniques, such as shading. It has nothing to do with the wave function per se, but is true of any 3D function f(x,y,z).
Aha. Simple enough. Thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top