Are some sub-fields of physics easier to get into than others?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zheng89120
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of faculty and student numbers in graduate programs when assessing admission chances. School A, with only 2 faculty and 2 graduate students in sub-field X, suggests limited interest in admitting many students, indicating a potentially more competitive admission process. In contrast, School B has 4 faculty and 15 graduate students, which may imply a higher capacity for accepting applicants in the same sub-field. However, some participants argue that these numbers alone do not provide a clear picture of admission difficulty, as factors like future faculty hiring plans could influence the situation. Overall, the consensus leans towards the idea that a program with fewer faculty in a specific sub-field is likely to be more selective, but the discussion acknowledges that various other factors could also play a significant role in the admissions process.
zheng89120
Messages
139
Reaction score
0
I am trying to apply to graduate school, and weighing my chances of getting into some programs.. I was wondering if the following scenario means anything:

School A has sub-field X, with 2 faculty and 2 graduate students
School B has sub-field X, with 4 faculty and 15 graduate students

Could this mean that school A is easier to get into than school B in sub-field X?

I realize there may also be other indications of how hard it is to get into a specific sub-field in a specific school.. Is it possible to easily get this kind of information (for sub-fields)?

Thanks for reading this.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No, school A has only 2 faculty in a sub-field X, which means that program is not interested in admitting many students who say they want to work in sub-field X. A department can only admit so many students and if your sub-field is poorly represented, you're not going to get to admit a lot of students for it.
 
Pengwuino said:
No, school A has only 2 faculty in a sub-field X, which means that program is not interested in admitting many students who say they want to work in sub-field X. A department can only admit so many students and if your sub-field is poorly represented, you're not going to get to admit a lot of students for it.
I don't know, I disagree with what you said. I don't think you can infer anything about the ease of getting into grad school going from those two facts alone. The department could just as well have plans to increase the number of faculty in sub-field X.
 
Ryker said:
I don't know, I disagree with what you said. I don't think you can infer anything about the ease of getting into grad school going from those two facts alone. The department could just as well have plans to increase the number of faculty in sub-field X.

That's kind of out of the scope of the discussion though. You could also say the university with the 12 faculty is going to be hit by a meteor after the application deadline. Assuming nothing radical like a meteor or a university quadrupling the number of faculty it has in a field in 1 year, the one with 2 people in the field is probably harder to get into.

Then again, I should have mentioned it, a school with 12 faculty in one area compared to 2 faculty in the area is probably going to get a LOT more applicants interested in that area than the one with 2 faculty.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top