Are Statistical Ensembles Just Mathematical Tools or Realistic Concepts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter parton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statistical
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether statistical ensembles are merely mathematical tools or if they represent realistic concepts. One viewpoint suggests that ensembles are primarily mathematical constructs due to their probabilistic nature, yet they effectively describe statistical systems. McQuarrie’s definition highlights ensembles as a mental or virtual collection of numerous systems mimicking a specific thermodynamic system. This perspective reinforces the idea that while ensembles may not be tangible, they are valuable for understanding thermodynamic behavior. Ultimately, the debate reflects the balance between mathematical abstraction and physical reality in statistical mechanics.
parton
Messages
79
Reaction score
1
Recently I was asked whether the concept of a statistical ensemble is actually realistic and I recognized that I can not really answer this question myself. I think that it is more a mathematical "tool", because of the probability nature rather than a realistic "thing", but still it helps us to describe statistical systems.

What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree. McQuarrie (in Statistical Mechanics, which I have handy) describes an ensemble as a "(mental or virtual) collection of a very large number of systems, each constructed to be a replica on a thermodynamic (macroscopic) level of a particular thermodynamic system of interest."
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
View full post »

Thread 'Why is the 3 body problem unsolvable? And what will happen if someone solves it?'

I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Statistical ensemble in phase space
Replies
29
Views
3K
I Minimal vs Instrumental vs Ensemble
2
Replies
84
Views
6K
A Statistical ensemble interpretation done right
7
Replies
309
Views
14K
I Concept of Thermal Equilibrium in the Context of Canonical Ensemble
Replies
5
Views
3K
Help Understanding Kerson Huang's Statistical Mechanics Textbook
Replies
1
Views
3K
I Questions about ensemble interpretation of QM
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Anti-realist Interpretations of QM
3
Replies
147
Views
10K
Other Programming in Statistics Careers
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Active transformation use-case in homogeneity
Replies
13
Views
1K
Understanding the Uniform Probability Distribution in Statistical Ensembles
5
Replies
231
Views
14K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top