Are There Always Conditions for Writing Q=CΔT in Heat Transfer Processes?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In heat transfer processes, the equation Q=CΔT applies under specific conditions, particularly in constant volume systems where C represents heat capacity. However, in isothermal processes, this equation fails as it implies Q=0, which is incorrect. Thermodynamics provides a more precise definition of heat capacity, distinguishing between constant volume (C_v) and constant pressure (C_p) scenarios. These definitions align with the first law of thermodynamics, confirming that Q can be expressed as ΔU or ΔH under the appropriate conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of heat transfer principles
  • Familiarity with the first law of thermodynamics
  • Knowledge of internal energy (U) and enthalpy (H)
  • Basic calculus for derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of heat capacity at constant volume (C_v) and constant pressure (C_p)
  • Explore the implications of the first law of thermodynamics in closed systems
  • Investigate the differences between path-dependent and state-dependent properties in thermodynamics
  • Learn about isothermal processes and their characteristics in heat transfer
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, thermodynamics researchers, and engineers involved in heat transfer analysis will benefit from this discussion.

FG_313
Messages
17
Reaction score
1
When dealing with heat transfer, there are cases where Q can be expressed by C*ΔT, for some proportionality constant C. However, in isothermal processes for example, this formula would lead to a mistake, for any value of C (because it would imply Q=0, which is not true generally speaking). What about a general process going from an initial state to a final one? Is it always possible to find such C?
Edit: I`ve just realized that I wrote "righting" instead of "writing" in the title. Sorry. <Moderator's note: title edited>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
In freshman physics, we learned that, when heat is added to a constant volume system, we can write Q = CΔT, where C is called the heat capacity. However, when we got more deeply into the basics and learned thermodynamics, we found that this elementary approach is no longer adequate (or precise). We found that Q depends on process path and that, if work W is occurring, this changes things. However, we still wanted C to continue to represent a physical property of the material being processed, and not to depend on process path or whether work is occurring. This is dealt with in thermodynamics by changing the definition of C a little. Rather than associating C with the path dependent heat Q, in thermodynamics, we associate C with parameters relating to the state of the material being processed, in particular internal energy U and enthalpy H. We define the heat capacity at constant volume ##C_v## as the derivative of the internal energy U with respect to temperature at constant volume:
$$C_v=\left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\right)_v\tag{1}$$
We also found that we could define a heat capacity at constant pressure ##C_p## as the derivative of the enthalpy H with resepct to temperature at constant pressure:$$C_p=\left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial T}\right)_p\tag{2}$$
The question is, "do either of these definitions reduce to the more elementary version from freshman physics under any circumstances." The answer is "yes." From the first law of thermodynamics, we find that, for a closed system of constant volume (no work being done), ##Q=\Delta U=C_v\Delta T##, and, for a closed system experiencing a constant pressure change (with ##W=p\Delta v##), ##Q=\Delta H=C_p\Delta T##. Of course, Eqns. 1 and 2 are much more generally applicable than this.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Andrew Mason and FG_313
Great answer, thank you very much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
477
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
14K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K