Are There Any Isolated Black Holes? Name a Few Here

  • Thread starter Thread starter taylordnz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes
AI Thread Summary
Isolated black holes are challenging to detect, primarily relying on gravitational lensing. The supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, known as Sgr A*, is often cited as an example of an isolated black hole, as it lacks visible accretion disks or jets. While black holes can emit X-rays when interacting with surrounding matter, those that are truly isolated would not exhibit such emissions. Additionally, black holes theoretically lose mass over time through Hawking radiation, but this effect is negligible for larger black holes. Overall, the detection of isolated black holes remains a complex topic in astrophysics.
taylordnz
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
are there any black holes found that have no companion stars or anything with them, are there any found?

if so could you please name a few on this thread

thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hard to find!

Originally posted by taylordnz
are there any black holes found that have no companion stars or anything with them, are there any found?

if so could you please name a few on this thread

thanks
If they were truly isolated, it's hard to imagine how they'd be detected, other than by gravitational lensing.

The one that best meets your criterion is the supermassive one at the centre of our Milky Way galaxy - we know it's there, how massive it is, etc, yet there are no accretion disks, jets, etc. Of course, if by 'companion stars' you mean stars orbiting about a BH, then we're such a companion (although there's an awful lot more mass than just the galactic BH which contributes to our motion).

This link gives you an idea of how 'alone' the Milky Way centre BH is:
http://www.eso.org/outreach/press-rel/pr-2002/pr-17-02.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Originally posted by Nereid
If they were truly isolated, it's hard to imagine how they'd be detected, other than by gravitational lensing.

The one that best meets your criterion is the supermassive one at the centre of our Milky Way galaxy - we know it's there, how massive it is, etc, yet there are no accretion disks, jets, etc. Of course, if by 'companion stars' you mean stars orbiting about a BH, then we're such a companion (although there's an awful lot more mass than just the galactic BH which contributes to our motion).

This link gives you an idea of how 'alone' the Milky Way centre BH is:
http://www.eso.org/outreach/press-rel/pr-2002/pr-17-02.html

There is a radio source at Sgr A* though - thought to be very low level activity due to heated matter orbiting the BH.

Jess
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Don't Black Holes emit X-rays? I believe that is a way to detect them. IF a BH doesn't have anything around it to "feed" on i believe it decays at a certain rate (i swear i saw a BH decay equation for a static BH that doesn't gain mass from "feeding" on objects)
 
Yes, black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation. The actual power lost by the black hole is a function of its size (and thus its mass): small black holes evaporate very very quickly, while large ones evaporate only very slowly.

- Warren
 
The Hawking radiation which stellar mass black holes emit, IIRC, is far less than what such a BH would emit just from absorption of stray ISM (inter-stellar medium) particles, and cosmic rays. For a giant BH like the one at the centre of the Milky Way, Hawking radiation would be undetectable, even from up close.
 
Originally posted by Nereid
The Hawking radiation which stellar mass black holes emit, IIRC, is far less than what such a BH would emit just from absorption of stray ISM (inter-stellar medium) particles, and cosmic rays. For a giant BH like the one at the centre of the Milky Way, Hawking radiation would be undetectable, even from up close.
Correctomundo. See: http://casa.colorado.edu/~ajsh/hawk.html and notice the middle of the page about the (lack of) energy from the 3 billion Ms in the giant elliptical galaxy M-87. Also, much more back awhile at:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=9878
 
Back
Top