I Are There Black Holes in Galaxy Clusters?

BadgerBadger92
Messages
168
Reaction score
87
I know that I'm most galaxies black holes live in the center. I'm wondering if this is true for Galaxy clusters. Are there black holes in the center of galaxy clusters?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BadgerBadger92 said:
I know that I'm most galaxies black holes live in the center. I'm wondering if this is true for Galaxy clusters. Are there black holes in the center of galaxy clusters?
I can't say for sure but I see absolutely no reason why we should expect for there to be. The formation of galaxies is very likely tied up with the central SMBH in some as yet unknown way, but clusters of galaxies would not seem to need them.
 
BadgerBadger92 said:
Are there black holes in the center of galaxy clusters?

As best we can tell, probably not. As phinds says, the central black hole is likely to be intimately involved in the formation of galaxies. But galaxy clusters don't form the same way. (In fact, as best we can tell, galaxy clusters are just a side effect of the way galaxies formed--the fact that the original fluctuations in density in the universe that led to the formation of galaxies were "clumped" in such a way that the galaxies were clustered together, with voids in between the clusters, instead of being spread evenly throughout the universe.)
 
I was just wondering because galaxies have enough mass to create a black hole, that Galaxy clusters will create enough of a "bend" to create a black hole. Can someone give me some details?

Video clips and articles are welcome
 
BadgerBadger92 said:
galaxies have enough mass to create a black hole

Creating a black hole is not a matter of having "enough mass". Black holes can be of any mass. What is required is to have enough mass in a very small volume.

We do not know exactly how the supermassive black holes at the centers of galaxies formed, but a plausible scenario is that the stars at the centers of galaxies formed individual black holes by gravitational collapse, and then those holes gradually merged into the supermassive ones we see at the centers of galaxies now. This is plausible because stars at the centers of galaxies are close enough together that you can get enough mass in a small enough volume.

A similar scenario does not work for galaxy clusters because individual galaxies in a cluster are too far apart, and there is no plausible way for the holes at the centers of galaxies to merge into larger ones.
 
PeterDonis said:
Creating a black hole is not a matter of having "enough mass". Black holes can be of any mass. What is required is to have enough mass in a very small volume.

We do not know exactly how the supermassive black holes at the centers of galaxies formed, but a plausible scenario is that the stars at the centers of galaxies formed individual black holes by gravitational collapse, and then those holes gradually merged into the supermassive ones we see at the centers of galaxies now. This is plausible because stars at the centers of galaxies are close enough together that you can get enough mass in a small enough volume.

A similar scenario does not work for galaxy clusters because individual galaxies in a cluster are too far apart, and there is no plausible way for the holes at the centers of galaxies to merge into larger ones.

Thank you, this is an excellent answer. I should have specified over the mass part (I wasn't clear enough)
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Back
Top