Are there methods for inverting non-square matrices under constraints?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nikratio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inversion Matrix
Click For Summary
Inverting a non-square matrix A under component constraints can be approached by seeking a constrained solution to the linear equations A . \vec{b} = \vec{c}. The pseudoinverse can provide an unconstrained solution, but additional components from the null space may be needed to meet the constraints |b_i| < α. A recommended method is to frame the problem as a linear programming challenge, which can be solved using the simplex method. This approach allows for minimizing the objective while adhering to the specified constraints. Utilizing linear programming resources will aid in finding effective solutions to this problem.
Nikratio
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I need to invert a non-square matrix A under the constraint that the absolute value of each component of the solution is less than some maximum. In other words, I want \vec{b} such that A . \vec b = \vec c and |b_i| &lt; \alpha.

Are there any established methods for doing this?

My idea is to start with the pseudoinverse to compute the unconstrained solution, and to then add components \vec v_i from the null space of A to satisfy the constraint. If this doesn't help, I wanted to consecutively add more basis vectors from the singular value decomposition of A, starting with the basis corresponding to the smallest singular value.

However, I don't see how to pick the coefficients of the \vec v_i in such a way that the final solution is optimal in the sense that there is no other solution that satiesfies the constraints but has a smaller ||A.\vec b - \vec c||.

Anyone able to help? Pointers to appropriate literature would be appreciated as well, I am not quite sure what keywords I should be looking for.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I see some confusion in your question, or at least nomenclature. You write b as a vector, in which case it certainly is not the pseudoinverse of A. It seems that you are asking for a constrained solution to a system of linear equations?
 
Yeah, you're right.

What I want is a constrained solution to the system of linear equations.

At the beginning I was thinking that maybe I can construct a matrix A^+ such that \vec b = A^+ . \vec c and \vec b satisfies the constraint. Construction of A^+ would then be a "constrained matrix inversion". But I no longer think that such a matrix can exist, so my problem is indeed to find a constrained solution to a system of linear equations.
 
One possible approach is to couch it as a linear programming problem that can be solved by the simplex method. This method solves systems of linear equations subject to simple constraints.

In this case you would minimize Ix, where I is the identity matrix, subject to the constraint
Ax < b
where the vector b has components alpha. A web search should turn up dozens of sites on simplex method and linear programming, and it is also covered in texts on numerical analysis.

I expect there's also a variant available somewhere to deal with the absolute value I|x|, or some means to reset any value that goes negative.
 
Linear Programming was exactly the right keyword, thank you so much! I should be able to find my way from here on.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 146 ·
5
Replies
146
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K