Are there multiverse models with infinte regress?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of multiverse models, particularly the Ekpyrotic model, which involves colliding branes and suggests the possibility of infinite regress. This model contrasts with the more commonly referenced eternal inflation model, which posits an infinite number of "pocket universes." While pocket universes are considered infinite in size and the process of their creation is viewed as eternal into the future, the question of whether this model extends infinitely into the past remains debated among researchers. Some theorists argue that eternal inflation must have a beginning, while others contend it may not. The overall consensus is that the nature of the multiverse and its origins is still uncertain and requires further exploration.
Philm
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I seem to recall a documentary that I watched a few years ago describing the multiverse, with M-theory, as being similar to slices of bread, all next to each other. (Obviously just an analogy for the lay person). And when these two universes next to each other collided, it would create a new universe. I'm pretty sure that it was said that this had an infinite regress, but now when I search online for any reference to a multiverse with an infinite regress, I can't find one.

Are there any multiverse models with an infinite regress?
 
Space news on Phys.org
The model you are referring to ( colliding branes) is the Ekpyrotic model of Turok and Steinhardt. You can read abut it here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ekpyrotic_universe
In cosmology when people talk about a multiverse they are normally talking about eternal inflation which is a very different model.
you can read about that here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal_inflation

Im not quite sure what you mean by infinite regress but it is typical in models of eternal inflation that the number of "pocket universes" as Guth calls them, is infinite. The pocket universes themelves are generally considered to be infinite in size. The process is also considered to be eternal into the future. Wehther or not it is eternal into the past is disputed amonst researchers who work within the eternal inflation context. Some like Vilenkin and Mithani say it must have had a beginning, other like Aguirre and Nomura say it didn't. Nobody knows ( assuming eternal inflation is even the right model of reality).
 
  • Like
Likes AgentSmith
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
5K
Back
Top