Are U and W Equal? Solving for Linear Independence in Subspaces

  • Thread starter Thread starter peripatein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspaces
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
15 replies · 3K views
peripatein
Messages
868
Reaction score
0
Hi,
How may I determine whether the subspaces U and W are equal to each other?:

K is linearly independent wrt V, defined thus:
K={v1,v2,v3,v4} subset of V
U and W, subspaces of V, are defined thus:
U=Sp(K); W=Sp{v1-v2,v2-v3,v3-v4,v4-v1}

I am not allowed to use equality between dimensions!

I have tried solving:
a1v1+a2v2+a3v3+a4v4=b1(v1-v2)+b2(v2-v3)+b3(v3-v4)+b4(v4-v1)
But I am not sure it got me anywhere :-/.

I hope one of you could assist. Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
peripatein said:
a1v1+a2v2+a3v3+a4v4=b1(v1-v2)+b2(v2-v3)+b3(v3-v4)+b4(v4-v1)
Seems like a reasonable start. Where did that lead?
 
It led to a1=b1-b4; a2=-b1+b2; a3=-b2+b3; a4=-b3+b4
I tried substituting them into a matrix but am not sure I got anything meaningful.
I also know that when a1v1+a2v2+a3v3+a4v4=0, a1=a2=a3=a4=0.
Any idea how I should proceed?
 
If you can show that v1-v2, v2-v3, v3-v4, and v4-v1 are independent then you are done. Do you see why?
 
I am not sure. If b1(v1-v2)+b2(v2-v3)+b3(v3-v4)+b4(v4-v1)=0 necessarily implies b1=b2=b3=b4=0, why does that mean that U=W? Isn't the homogeneous system merely a private case? Were U and W both linearly independent, why would U be equal to W?
 
peripatein said:
It led to a1=b1-b4; a2=-b1+b2; a3=-b2+b3; a4=-b3+b4
I tried substituting them into a matrix but am not sure I got anything meaningful.
I also know that when a1v1+a2v2+a3v3+a4v4=0, a1=a2=a3=a4=0.
Any idea how I should proceed?

If you add those equations up you get a1+a2+a3+a4=0. What would that tell you?
 
Does that tell me that {v1,v2,v3,v4} is linearly dependent as a1, a2, a3, a4 are not forcibly all zero?
 
I would say it means that only SOME vectors in Sp{v1,v2,v3,v4} are also in Sp{v1-v2,v2-v3,v3-v4,v4-v1}. Can you tell me why?
 
As for the two spans to be equal certain conditions must be met, i.e. a system of equations must be solved which imposes certain limitations on the values of the scalars.
 
peripatein said:
As for the two spans to be equal certain conditions must be met, i.e. a system of equations must be solved which imposes certain limitations on the values of the scalars.

That's pretty vague. You wrote a system of equations. One conclusion of that was that if v=a1v1+a2v2+a3v3+a4v4 then v can only be in Sp{v1-v2,v2-v3,v3-v4,v4-v1} if a1+a2+a3+a4=0. Is that condition true for any vectors in Sp{v1,v2,v3,v4}? Is it untrue for any vectors in the span?
 
My point was that since you are given that v1, v2, v3, b4 are independent, the subspace they span has dimension 4. The other 4 vectors, v1-v2,v2-v3,v3-v4,v4-v1, will span that subset if and only if they are independent.
 
Okay, so I have therefore tried showing that b1(v1-v2)+b2(v2-v3)+b3(v3-v4)+b4(v4-v1)=0, implies b1=b2=b3=b4=0 (for linear independence). However, based on the fact that a1v1+a2v2+a3v3+a4v4=0 for a1=a2=a3=a4=0, all I got was that b1=b2=b3=b4=any real number (i.e. not necessarily zero)! How shall I proceed?
 
peripatein said:
Okay, so I have therefore tried showing that b1(v1-v2)+b2(v2-v3)+b3(v3-v4)+b4(v4-v1)=0, implies b1=b2=b3=b4=0 (for linear independence). However, based on the fact that a1v1+a2v2+a3v3+a4v4=0 for a1=a2=a3=a4=0, all I got was that b1=b2=b3=b4=any real number (i.e. not necessarily zero)! How shall I proceed?

Good job. Wouldn't that show that they are NOT linearly independent?
 
I was somehow under the impression that U WAS in fact equal to W, so I did expect linear independence in both cases. Is the conclusion then that U is necessarily not equal to W?
 
peripatein said:
I was somehow under the impression that U WAS in fact equal to W, so I did expect linear independence in both cases. Is the conclusion then that U is necessarily not equal to W?

Yes, U isn't equal to W. And not even 'necessarily'. It just plain isn't. (v1-v2)+(v2-v3)+(v3-v4)+(v4-v1)=0. That doesn't sound linearly independent to me.