Are water waves indicative of QED?

  • Thread starter Thread starter truhaht
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qed Water Waves
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between water waves and quantum electrodynamics (QED), suggesting that the formation of regular waves from a gentle breeze might reflect underlying quantum mechanics principles. The idea is presented that the chemical bonding of water molecules, influenced by QED, contributes to the observed wave patterns rather than chaotic forms like square or saw waves. The conversation touches on the nature of probabilistic clustering in QED, noting that while the concepts may seem intuitive, they lack substantial meaning in this context. A question is raised regarding the use of "quantized" in the discussion, indicating a potential misunderstanding of its application compared to quantum mechanics. Overall, the connection between water waves and QED remains speculative and open to interpretation.
truhaht
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Maybe not.

I'm just thinking, idly...

If, under controlled conditions, you blow a steady gentle breeze across the surface of an otherwise perfectly calm body of water, I figure you'd make a ripple of (regular) waves. A steady-state analog input, yet quantized rhythmic output. Do you suppose that is somehow indicative of quantum mechanics at work? ..perhaps a reflection of the fine structure of matter and Planck's constant?

I just find it interesting; thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have thought this before and came to the conclusion that it must be. The reason we see waves is due to the way in which the water is chemically bonded, which is in turn due to QED. I mean why is it we don't see a square wave or saw wave or some sort of random wave. I don't know for sure but I think it is.
 
Instinctively, it's no mystery that when chaos is forced into an orderly march, the transition would have to be a choppy one. [To wit, The perfectly calm body of water is a chaos of individually buzzing/moving molecules and the breeze exerts a force that tends those nearest the surface to move in conform.]

Maybe most of QED is fairly instinctive.

Probabilistic clustering is another example I can come up with that is instinctively-grasped. QED is an expression of probabilities, of course.
 
This sounds pretty, but isn't very meaningful.

truhaht said:
Maybe not.
A steady-state analog input, yet quantized rhythmic output.

What do you mean by "quantized" here? It's certainly not the same meaning as in QM.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Back
Top