Are You Ready to Prove Your Knowledge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the idea of having a "take" on everything and the implications of claiming to know it all. Participants challenge the notion of possessing a comprehensive understanding of complex topics, such as the Vietnam War, while questioning the credibility of those who assert they have dated opinions on various subjects. The conversation shifts to lighter topics, including food and drink preferences, but ultimately returns to the critique of arrogance and the importance of sincerity in discussions. The emphasis is on the need for humility and the recognition that no one can truly know everything, highlighting the value of credibility in discourse.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
Please stand up and be counted, if you think you do :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have a take on every thing, so i guess the odds are my take pre dated yours
:biggrin:
 
I have a take on every thing, so i guess the odds are my take pre dated yours

Please explain to the studio audience your "take" on everything, and more importantly, how you believe that having a "dated" take enabled you to have a "take" on "everything", when ALL of the information about "everything" had not been known at the point you established your "dated take".

That was then. This is now.

And, no help from the studio audience, please.

o:)
 
{claps}

well...the studio card told me to
 
wolram said:
I have a take on every thing, so i guess the odds are my take pre dated yours
:biggrin:

if you know everything please explain to me the politics of the vietnam war in depth
 
wolram said:
I have a take on every thing, so i guess the odds are my take pre dated yours
:biggrin:
What do you think of Struensee?
 
arildno said:
What do you think of Struensee?



Vanessa, a very busy lady.
 
Ki Man said:
if you know everything please explain to me the politics of the vietnam war in depth

They were very deeply screwed up.
 
wolram said:
Vanessa, a very busy lady.
Carolina Mathilda was bored, I think..
 
  • #10
What am I going to do now?
 
  • #11
Lisa! said:
What am I going to do now?
Eat a chocolate.
 
  • #12
Chocolate is good, beer is better!
 
  • #13
Chocolate beer.
 
  • #14
Evo said:
Chocolate beer.

What about beer chocolate ?
 
  • #15
What pub am i about to go to? Will give you a clue, its somewhere in the new forest.
 
  • #16
Hmmm, could be the The Filly Inn or the snakecatcher, but it is a bit early to
go to the pub.
 
  • #17
Hello wolram.

o:)
 
  • #18
Thats good guessing, i know both of them! And its not earlyiif you going to have dinner at the pub first.
 
  • #19
Andy said:
Thats good guessing, i know both of them! And its not earlyiif you going to have dinner at the pub first.

Which one are you going to, and what's for dinner ?
 
  • #20
jimmie said:
Hello wolram.
o:)
Hijimmie how are you wearing.
 
  • #21
I am alright.

How is your "self"?

o:)
 
  • #22
The bold forester and I am thinking about having the gammon steak, with a chocolate brownie sundae for desert but I am not too sure yet.
 
  • #23
Andy said:
The bold forester and I am thinking about having the gammon steak, with a chocolate brownie sundae for desert but I am not too sure yet.

I can not eat gammon it makes me ill just the smell or the thought of it makes
my toes curl.

I have a bit of an ache on my right side but apart from that i am fine thanks
jimmie.
 
  • #24
I am glad to hear any individual say they are fine. :smile:

So, wolram, you may or may not be aware but, the studio audience is awaiting your response to my orginal reply to your thread. :biggrin:

Have you considered my reply?

o:)
 
  • #25
jimmie said:
I am glad to hear any individual say they are fine. :smile:
So, wolram, you may or may not be aware but, the studio audience is awaiting your response to my orginal reply to your thread. :biggrin:
Have you considered my reply?
o:)

Dud a da dum oo oo, a tardis
 
  • #26
I "take" it you are not able to EXPLAIN "everything".

An acronym, wolram, is not an explanation, but you "know" that.

If it was possible to travel in "time", and it is not, would you wolram, have intended to be a humble and joyful individual that gladly shared with other individuals ORIGINAL thoughts on any particular subject, rather than an individual that is so full of arrogance and demands so much attention for his "self" that he would create a thread on a public forum proclaiming his ability to "know-it-all", only to spew abbreviated sentences and tired old acronyms, without SINCERITY. And, by demanding attention to his self, rendered him FULLY EXPOSED to any "challenge" that he puts forth.

Now, wolram, everyone on the planet that has access to the internet and can understand english is able to be aware that the individual behind the word "wolram", on Physics Forums, in fact does NOT "know-it-all", and that ultimately, your conceited belief that was not "right" obligates every individual that intends to believe what you say to contemplate the question, "wolram was not 'right' then, is he not 'right' now?"

Credibility is everything.

wolram, can you say "not wise"? You "know" you can.

o:)
 
Last edited:
  • #27
jimmie said:
I "take" it you are not able to EXPLAIN "everything".
An acronym, wolram, is not an explanation, but you "know" that.
If it was possible to travel in "time", and it is not, would you wolram, have intended to be a humble and joyful individual that gladly shared with other individuals ORIGINAL thoughts on any particular subject, rather than an individual that is so full of arrogance and demands so much attention for his "self" that he would create a thread on a public forum proclaiming his ability to "know-it-all", only to spew abbreviated sentences and tired old acronyms, without SINCERITY. And, by demanding attention to his self, rendered him FULLY EXPOSED to any "challenge" that he puts forth.
Now, wolram, everyone on the planet that has access to the internet and can understand english is aware that the individual behind the word "wolram", on Physics Forums, in fact does NOT "know-it-all", and that ultimately, your conceded belief that was not "right" obligates every individual that intends to believe what you say to contemplate the question, "wolram was not 'right' then, is he not 'right' now?"
Credibility is everything.
wolram, can you "not wise"? You "know" you can.
o:)

He , He, Woram , knows , that any thing he says is wrong, now prove me
right
 
Back
Top