Area Element of Elliptic Cylinder Coordinates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The area element for elliptic cylinder coordinates is derived using the parametric equations x=a*cosh(u)*cos(v) and y=a*sinh(u)*sin(v). The correct expression for the area element dA is given by dA = a^2*du*dv*(sinh(u)^2*cos(v)^2 + cosh(u)^2*sin(v)^2). This formulation is confirmed through the use of the cross product of the position vectors derived from the parametric equations, providing a more compact and accurate representation than previous attempts that included terms like du^2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parametric equations in multivariable calculus
  • Familiarity with elliptic cylinder coordinates
  • Knowledge of vector calculus, specifically cross products
  • Basic proficiency in differential geometry concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of area elements in different coordinate systems
  • Learn about the applications of elliptic cylinder coordinates in physics and engineering
  • Explore vector calculus techniques, particularly the use of cross products in surface area calculations
  • Investigate the properties and applications of hyperbolic functions in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with multivariable calculus and need to compute area elements in non-Cartesian coordinate systems.

jameson2
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Compute the area element for elliptic cylinder coordinates


Homework Equations


The coordinates are defined as follows:
x=a*cosh(u)*cos(v)
y=a*sinh(u)*sin(v)


The Attempt at a Solution


Starting from the assumption that the area element dA=dx*dy, I found dx and dy:
dx=a*du*sinh(u)*cos(v) - a*cosh(u)*dv*sin(v)
dy=a*du*cosh(u)*sin(v) - a*sinh(u)*dv*cos(v)

Then multiplying these together, to get dA:
dA=[(a^2)*sinh(u)*cosh(u)*sin(v)*cos(v)*(du^2 - dv^2)] +
[(a^2)*du*dv*((sinh(u))^2)*((cos(v))^2) - (cosh(u))^2)*((sin(v))^2)]

I don't like this answer for a couple of reasons. It seems like there should be a tidier, more compact expression than what I have. Compared to surface elements in other coordinate systems, this is frankly a mess. Also, I don't think I've seen a "du^2" in any area element formulae either, which I'm not sure makes it wrong, but I feel a little uneasy about it anyway.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you say "multiplying these together", what kind of product did you use? If a surface is given by parametric equations, x= x(u,v), y= y(u,v), z= z(u,v), then the "position vector" is [itex]\vec{r}= x(u,v)\vec{i}+ y(u,v)\vec{j}+ z(u,v)\vec{k}[/itex], the derivatives in the directions of the u, v axes are [itex]\vec{r}_u= x_u \vec{i}+ y_u\vec{j}+ z_u\vec{k}[/itex] and [itex]\vec{r}_v= x_v \vec{i}+ y_v\vec{j}+ z_v\vec{k}[/itex]. The differential of surface area is the length of the cross product of those two vectors times dudv.
 
So in vector form: dr/du=(a*sinh(u)*cos(v) , a*cosh(u)*sin(v) , 0)
and dr/dv=(-a*cosh(u)*sin(v) , a*sinh(u)*cos(v) , 0)

Multiplying across by du and dv respectively:
dr=(a*sinh(u)*cos(v)du , a*cosh(u)*sin(v)du , 0) with dr w.r.t "u"
and dr=(-a*cosh(u)*sin(v)dv , a*sinh(u)*cos(v)dv , 0) with dr w.r.t "v"

Then cross product of these vectors gives:
dA=length of the vector: [0,0,(a^2*du*dv*(sinh(u)^2*cos(v)^2 + cosh(u)^2*sin(v)^2))]

And the length of this vector is just the third component, so is this the answer for dA?
It seems a better answer than my original one, and the reasoning behind this method makes perfect sense to me.

dA= a^2*du*dv*(sinh(u)^2*cos(v)^2 + cosh(u)^2*sin(v)^2)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K