Area section of a sphere used for integration?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The area of a section of a sphere used for integration is defined by the formula (r * dtheta) (r * sin(theta) * dphi), where dtheta and dphi represent the differential angles. This formula is derived from the change of variable theorem in multivariable calculus, specifically through the Jacobian determinant when transforming from Cartesian to polar coordinates. The integration of theta from 0 to pi and phi from 0 to 2*pi yields the total surface area of the sphere, confirming the validity of the differential area formula. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the geometric interpretation of the angles and the infinitesimal quantities involved in the calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polar coordinates and their relationship to Cartesian coordinates
  • Familiarity with multivariable calculus concepts, particularly the Jacobian determinant
  • Knowledge of integration techniques in calculus
  • Basic understanding of differential geometry and surface area calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Jacobian matrix and its applications in coordinate transformations
  • Learn about the derivation of volume elements in polar coordinates
  • Explore classical mechanics textbooks for informal arguments on infinitesimal quantities
  • Investigate advanced integration techniques in multivariable calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with integration in polar coordinates, as well as those seeking to deepen their understanding of surface area calculations in three-dimensional geometry.

xerxes73
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I cannot figure out why the area of a section of a sphere used for integration is:

(r * dtheta) (r * sin(theta) * dphi) ?

where dtheta and dphi are the differential angles that subtend the arcs, which make up the sides of the rectangle used for the differential area.

I did an integral of theta from 0 to pi and phi from 0 to 2*pi and the result was the area of a sphere. That is the correct result if the above formula was the correct differential area.

I see that this formula is made up of the angle that subtends the arc (the dtheta or dphi) multiplied by the length of one of the triangle's legs. The "triangle" that I mention here is the triangle that has two legs from the center of the sphere to the arc that is one side of the area rectangle. I just don't know why this would be the correct differential area and not some other formula?

Thanks!
-xerxes73
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See the wiki page on the change of variable formula:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Change_of_variable#Substitution_for_multiple_variables

Basically, it says that as you change from cartesian to polar coordinate, in order for the result of the integral to be the same, you have to multiply by the absolute value of the determinant of the jacobian matrix of the transformation map. This is just the multivariable analogue of the know change of variable theorem for functions of 1 variable:

\int_g^{-1}(a)^g^{-1}(b)f(g(t))g'(t)dt = \int_a^bf(t)dt

So that r^2sin(theta) from dr * (r * dtheta) (r * sin(theta) * dphi) is the absolute value of the determinant of the jacobian matrix of the transformation map from polar to cartesian coordinate.

Of course it is also possible to give an informal but intuitively satisfying argument involving "infinitesimal quantities" justifying the formula dr * (r * dtheta) (r * sin(theta) * dphi) for the volume element in polar coordinates. You can find this argument in some classical mechanics textbooks and multivaribale calculus textbooks.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K