Aren't there infinitely many primes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PcumP_Ravenclaw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Primes
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the sequence defined as sn = 1/n for prime numbers and sn = 0 for non-prime numbers. It emphasizes that while there are infinitely many prime numbers, the limit of the sequence as n approaches infinity is 0, since 1/n approaches 0 for large n. The distinction between the sequence of sn and the sequence of 1/prime numbers is clarified, with both limits ultimately being 0. The conversation also highlights the importance of understanding the definitions provided in the problem statement. Overall, the sequence's behavior is consistent with its defined terms.
PcumP_Ravenclaw
Messages
105
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


sn= 1/n if n is a prime number; sn = 0 if n is not prime.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


We know that there are infinitely many prime numbers as n tends to infinity so why is ## \frac{1}{(prime number)} ## not equal to zero when n is a prime number?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PcumP_Ravenclaw said:

Homework Statement


sn= 1/n if n is a prime number; sn = 0 if n is not prime.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


We know that there are infinitely many prime numbers as n tends to infinity so why is ## \frac{1}{(prime number)} ## not equal to zero when n is a prime number?
It looks like Sn is a term in a series with a particular definition. That definition is what you have given.

Is this a fragment from a problem you have been given.

Please state the complete problem.
 
SammyS said:
It looks like Sn is a term in a series with a particular definition. That definition is what you have given.

Is this a fragment from a problem you have been given.

Please state the complete problem.

The question to this problem is as below.

For each of the sequences defined in below, state whether or not it tends
to a limit. If a sequence has a limit, make an ##(\epsilon,N )## table, taking
## \epsilon = 0.001 ## and any other values that you like.
 
PcumP_Ravenclaw said:

Homework Statement


sn= 1/n if n is a prime number; sn = 0 if n is not prime.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


We know that there are infinitely many prime numbers as n tends to infinity so why is ## \frac{1}{(prime number)} ## not equal to zero when n is a prime number?

When n is an integer (prime or not), 1/n is not zero; however, it is small if n is large. In fact, 1/n is never 0, but ##0 = \lim_{n \to \infty} 1/n ##.
 
Because there are an infinite number of primes, the limit as n goes to infinity of your sequence is 0. Now, \frac{1}{primenumber} is a different sequence all though its limit is also 0.

Your series "a_n" is 0, 1/2, 1/3, 0, 1/5, 0, 1/7, 0, 0, 0, 1/11, ...
Your series "\frac{1}{primenumber}" is 1/2, 1/3 ,1/5, 1/7, 1/11, 1/13, 1/17, ...
 
HallsofIvy said:
Because there are an infinite number of primes, the limit as n goes to infinity of your sequence is 0. Now, \frac{1}{primenumber} is a different sequence all though its limit is also 0.

Your series "a_n" is 0, 1/2, 1/3, 0, 1/5, 0, 1/7, 0, 0, 0, 1/11, ...
Your series "\frac{1}{primenumber}" is 1/2, 1/3 ,1/5, 1/7, 1/11, 1/13, 1/17, ...
how do you know that for the an sequence non-prime terms for n equal 0? its not given in the question.
 
PcumP_Ravenclaw said:
how do you know that for the an sequence non-prime terms for n equal 0? its not given in the question.
It is given in the definition of the sequence.

It seems you don't understand the word "defined".

PcumP_Ravenclaw said:
The question to this problem is as below.

For each of the sequences defined in below, state whether or not it tends
to a limit. If a sequence has a limit, make an ##(\epsilon,N )## table, taking
## \epsilon = 0.001 ## and any other values that you like.
PcumP_Ravenclaw said:

Homework Statement


sn= 1/n if n is a prime number; sn = 0 if n is not prime.
...
The definition of this sequence is:

sn = 1/n, if n is prime
sn = 0, if n is not prime​

1 is not prime, so s1 = 0
2 is prime, so s2 = 1/2
3 is prime, so s3 = 1/3
4 is not prime, so s4 = 0
5 is prime, so s5 = 1/5
6 is not prime, so s6 = 0
7 is prime, so s7 = 1/7
8 is not prime, so s8 = 0
9 is not prime, so s9 = 0
10 is not prime, so s10 = 0
11 is prime, so s11 = 1/11
...

Get it ?
 
  • Like
Likes PcumP_Ravenclaw
SammyS said:
It is given in the definition of the sequence.

It seems you don't understand the word "defined".
The definition of this sequence is:

sn = 1/n, if n is prime
sn = 0, if n is not prime​

1 is not prime, so s1 = 0
2 is prime, so s2 = 1/2
3 is prime, so s3 = 1/3
4 is not prime, so s4 = 0
5 is prime, so s5 = 1/5
6 is not prime, so s6 = 0
7 is prime, so s7 = 1/7
8 is not prime, so s8 = 0
9 is not prime, so s9 = 0
10 is not prime, so s10 = 0
11 is prime, so s11 = 1/11
...

Get it ?
yes right. Its given in the question. danke! Haste leads to waste!
 
Back
Top